From: Chao Leng <lengchao@huawei.com>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
"Daniel Wagner" <dwagner@suse.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] nvme-multipath: Early exit if no path is available
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 15:45:39 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <81b22bbf-4dd3-6161-e63a-9699690a4e4f@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <65392653-6b03-9195-f686-5fe4b3290bd2@suse.de>
On 2021/1/29 15:06, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 1/29/21 4:07 AM, Chao Leng wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2021/1/29 9:42, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
>>>
>>>>> You can't see exactly where it dies but I followed the assembly to
>>>>> nvme_round_robin_path(). Maybe it's not the initial nvme_next_ns(head,
>>>>> old) which returns NULL but nvme_next_ns() is returning NULL eventually
>>>>> (list_next_or_null_rcu()).
>>>> So there is other bug cause nvme_next_ns abormal.
>>>> I review the code about head->list and head->current_path, I find 2 bugs
>>>> may cause the bug:
>>>> First, I already send the patch. see:
>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nvme/20210128033351.22116-1-lengchao@huawei.com/
>>>> Second, in nvme_ns_remove, list_del_rcu is before
>>>> nvme_mpath_clear_current_path. This may cause "old" is deleted from the
>>>> "head", but still use "old". I'm not sure there's any other
>>>> consideration here, I will check it and try to fix it.
>>>
>>> The reason why we first remove from head->list and only then clear
>>> current_path is because the other way around there is no way
>>> to guarantee that that the ns won't be assigned as current_path
>>> again (because it is in head->list).
>> ok, I see.
>>>
>>> nvme_ns_remove fences continue of deletion of the ns by synchronizing
>>> the srcu such that for sure the current_path clearance is visible.
>> The list will be like this:
>> head->next = ns1;
>> ns1->next = head;
>> old->next = ns1;
>
> Where does 'old' pointing to?
>
>> This may cause infinite loop in nvme_round_robin_path.
>> for (ns = nvme_next_ns(head, old);
>> ns != old;
>> ns = nvme_next_ns(head, ns))
>> The ns will always be ns1, and then infinite loop.
>
> No. nvme_next_ns() will return NULL.
If there is just one path(the "old") and the "old" is deleted,
nvme_next_ns() will return NULL.
The list like this:
head->next = head;
old->next = head;
If there is two or more path and the "old" is deleted,
"for" will be infinite loop. because nvme_next_ns() will return
the path which in the list except the "old", check condition will
be true for ever.
For example, there is two path: one is the "old", another is "ns1".
The list like this:
head->next = ns1;
ns1->next = head;
old->next = ns1;
nvme_next_ns(head, old) will return ns1;
Then nvme_next_ns(head, ns1) will return ns1;
And then infinite loop.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Hannes
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvme mailing list
Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-29 7:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-27 10:30 [PATCH v2] nvme-multipath: Early exit if no path is available Daniel Wagner
2021-01-27 10:34 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-01-27 16:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-28 1:31 ` Chao Leng
2021-01-28 7:58 ` Daniel Wagner
2021-01-28 9:18 ` Chao Leng
2021-01-28 9:23 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-01-29 1:18 ` Chao Leng
2021-01-28 9:40 ` Daniel Wagner
2021-01-29 1:23 ` Chao Leng
2021-01-29 1:42 ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-01-29 3:07 ` Chao Leng
2021-01-29 3:30 ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-01-29 3:36 ` Chao Leng
2021-01-29 7:06 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-01-29 7:45 ` Chao Leng [this message]
2021-01-29 8:33 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-01-29 8:46 ` Chao Leng
2021-01-29 9:20 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-02-01 2:16 ` Chao Leng
2021-02-01 7:29 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-02-01 8:47 ` Chao Leng
2021-02-01 8:57 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-02-01 9:40 ` Chao Leng
2021-02-01 10:45 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-02-02 1:12 ` Chao Leng
2021-01-28 1:36 ` Chao Leng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=81b22bbf-4dd3-6161-e63a-9699690a4e4f@huawei.com \
--to=lengchao@huawei.com \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=dwagner@suse.de \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox