Linux-NVME Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
To: Chaitanya Kulkarni <Chaitanya.Kulkarni@wdc.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
	Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
Cc: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>, Stephen Bates <sbates@raithlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH blktests v2 03/11] common/xfs: Create common helper to verify block device with xfs
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2020 17:59:35 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <868f8fb6-6024-d60d-a9aa-6513b9d0986f@deltatee.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BYAPR04MB4965C2DDD4A5FBD86A128FE9860D0@BYAPR04MB4965.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>



On 2020-10-06 5:50 p.m., Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote:
> On 9/30/20 11:54, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
>> Make a common helper from the code in tests nvme/012 and nvme/013
>> to run an fio verify on a XFS file system backed by the
>> specified block device.
>>
>> While we are at it, all the output is redirected to $FULL instead of
>> /dev/null.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
>> ---
>>  common/xfs     | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  tests/nvme/012 | 14 +-------------
>>  tests/nvme/013 | 14 +-------------
>>  3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> 
> The common namespace is getting cluttered. Can you please create
> 
> a subdirectory common/fs/xfs ?

I disagree. The common directory only has 9 files. And given there
appear to be no other files to add to the fs directory I don't think now
is the time to create a directory. We can do so if and when a number of
other fs helpers show up and there's a reason to group them together.

>>
>> diff --git a/common/xfs b/common/xfs
>> index d1a603b8c7b5..210c924cdd41 100644
>> --- a/common/xfs
>> +++ b/common/xfs
>> @@ -9,3 +9,25 @@
>>  _have_xfs() {
>>  	_have_fs xfs && _have_program mkfs.xfs
>>  }
>> +
>> +_xfs_mkfs_and_mount() {
>> +	local bdev=$1
>> +	local mount_dir=$2
>> +
>> +	mkdir -p "${mount_dir}"
>> +	umount "${mount_dir}"
>> +	mkfs.xfs -l size=32m -f "${bdev}"
>> +	mount "${bdev}" "${mount_dir}"
>> +}
>> +
>> +_xfs_run_fio_verify_io() {
>> +	local mount_dir="/mnt/blktests"
> 
> The mount dir should be a parameter and not the hardcode value
> to make it reusable.

I also disagree here. It is already reusable and is used in a number of
places; none of those places require changing the mount directory. If
and when a use comes up that requires a different directory (not sure
what that would be), a parameter can be added. It is typically standard
practice in the Linux community to not add features that have no users
as it's confusing to people reading the code.

Logan

_______________________________________________
Linux-nvme mailing list
Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme

  reply	other threads:[~2020-10-06 23:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-30 18:54 [PATCH blktests v2 00/11] NVMe Target Passthru Block Tests Logan Gunthorpe
2020-09-30 18:54 ` [PATCH blktests v2 01/11] common/fio: Remove state file in common helper Logan Gunthorpe
2020-09-30 18:54 ` [PATCH blktests v2 02/11] common/xfs: Create common helper to check for XFS support Logan Gunthorpe
2020-10-06 23:44   ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2020-10-06 23:51     ` Logan Gunthorpe
2020-10-07  0:58       ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2020-09-30 18:54 ` [PATCH blktests v2 03/11] common/xfs: Create common helper to verify block device with xfs Logan Gunthorpe
2020-10-06 23:50   ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2020-10-06 23:59     ` Logan Gunthorpe [this message]
     [not found]       ` <BYAPR04MB49652338A4FE3805F9394A88860A0@BYAPR04MB4965.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
2020-10-07 15:53         ` Logan Gunthorpe
2020-09-30 18:54 ` [PATCH blktests v2 04/11] nvme: Search for specific subsysnqn in _find_nvme_loop_dev Logan Gunthorpe
2020-10-06 23:55   ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2020-10-07  0:10     ` Logan Gunthorpe
     [not found]       ` <BYAPR04MB49650C6419A84705D04FFE63860A0@BYAPR04MB4965.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
2020-10-07 15:55         ` Logan Gunthorpe
2020-09-30 18:54 ` [PATCH blktests v2 05/11] nvme: Add common helpers for passthru tests Logan Gunthorpe
2020-10-07  0:02   ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2020-10-07  0:13     ` Logan Gunthorpe
2020-09-30 18:54 ` [PATCH blktests v2 06/11] nvme/033: Simple test to create and connect to a passthru target Logan Gunthorpe
2020-09-30 18:54 ` [PATCH blktests v2 07/11] nvme/034: Add test for passthru data verification Logan Gunthorpe
2020-09-30 18:54 ` [PATCH blktests v2 08/11] nvme/035: Add test to verify passthru controller with a filesystem Logan Gunthorpe
2020-09-30 18:54 ` [PATCH blktests v2 09/11] nvme/036: Add test for testing reset command on nvme-passthru Logan Gunthorpe
2020-09-30 18:54 ` [PATCH blktests v2 10/11] nvme/037: Add test which loops passthru connect and disconnect Logan Gunthorpe
2020-09-30 18:54 ` [PATCH blktests v2 11/11] nvme/038: Test removal of un-enabled subsystem and ports Logan Gunthorpe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=868f8fb6-6024-d60d-a9aa-6513b9d0986f@deltatee.com \
    --to=logang@deltatee.com \
    --cc=Chaitanya.Kulkarni@wdc.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=osandov@osandov.com \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    --cc=sbates@raithlin.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox