From: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
To: Ofir Gal <ofir.gal@volumez.com>,
davem@davemloft.net, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
kbusch@kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk, hch@lst.de,
philipp.reisner@linbit.com, lars.ellenberg@linbit.com,
christoph.boehmwalder@linbit.com, idryomov@gmail.com,
xiubli@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] net: introduce helper sendpages_ok()
Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 11:51:04 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8d0c198f-9c15-4a8f-957a-2e4aecddd2e5@grimberg.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240530142417.146696-2-ofir.gal@volumez.com>
On 30/05/2024 17:24, Ofir Gal wrote:
> Network drivers are using sendpage_ok() to check the first page of an
> iterator in order to disable MSG_SPLICE_PAGES. The iterator can
> represent list of contiguous pages.
>
> When MSG_SPLICE_PAGES is enabled skb_splice_from_iter() is being used,
> it requires all pages in the iterator to be sendable. Therefore it needs
> to check that each page is sendable.
>
> The patch introduces a helper sendpages_ok(), it returns true if all the
> contiguous pages are sendable.
>
> Drivers who want to send contiguous pages with MSG_SPLICE_PAGES may use
> this helper to check whether the page list is OK. If the helper does not
> return true, the driver should remove MSG_SPLICE_PAGES flag.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ofir Gal <ofir.gal@volumez.com>
> ---
> include/linux/net.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/net.h b/include/linux/net.h
> index 688320b79fcc..b33bdc3e2031 100644
> --- a/include/linux/net.h
> +++ b/include/linux/net.h
> @@ -322,6 +322,26 @@ static inline bool sendpage_ok(struct page *page)
> return !PageSlab(page) && page_count(page) >= 1;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Check sendpage_ok on contiguous pages.
> + */
> +static inline bool sendpages_ok(struct page *page, size_t len, size_t offset)
> +{
> + unsigned int pagecount;
> + size_t page_offset;
> + int k;
> +
> + page = page + offset / PAGE_SIZE;
> + page_offset = offset % PAGE_SIZE;
lets not modify the input page variable.
p = page + offset >> PAGE_SHIFT;
poffset = offset & PAGE_MASK;
> + pagecount = DIV_ROUND_UP(len + page_offset, PAGE_SIZE);
> +
> + for (k = 0; k < pagecount; k++)
> + if (!sendpage_ok(page + k))
> + return false;
perhaps instead of doing a costly DIV_ROUND_UP for every network send we
can do:
count = 0;
while (count < len) {
if (!sendpage_ok(p))
return false;
page++;
count += PAGE_SIZE;
}
And we can lose page_offset.
It can be done in a number of ways, but we should be able to do it
without the DIV_ROUND_UP...
I still don't understand how a page in the middle of a contiguous range ends
up coming from the slab while others don't.
Ofir, can you please check which condition in sendpage_ok actually fails?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-31 8:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-30 14:24 [PATCH v2 0/4] bugfix: Introduce sendpages_ok() to check sendpage_ok() on contiguous pages Ofir Gal
2024-05-30 14:24 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] net: introduce helper sendpages_ok() Ofir Gal
2024-05-31 7:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-05-31 8:51 ` Sagi Grimberg [this message]
2024-06-03 12:35 ` Ofir Gal
2024-06-03 21:27 ` Sagi Grimberg
2024-06-04 4:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-04 8:24 ` Sagi Grimberg
2024-06-04 13:01 ` Sagi Grimberg
2024-06-06 12:57 ` Ofir Gal
2024-06-06 13:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-06 13:18 ` Ofir Gal
2024-06-06 13:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-06 15:42 ` Ofir Gal
2024-05-30 14:24 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] nvme-tcp: use sendpages_ok() instead of sendpage_ok() Ofir Gal
2024-05-31 7:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-05-30 14:24 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] drbd: " Ofir Gal
2024-06-04 14:43 ` Christoph Böhmwalder
2024-05-30 14:24 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] libceph: " Ofir Gal
2024-05-31 7:32 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] bugfix: Introduce sendpages_ok() to check sendpage_ok() on contiguous pages Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-01 22:36 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-06-04 4:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-04 14:42 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-06-05 7:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-01 22:34 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-06-02 7:48 ` Sagi Grimberg
2024-06-03 9:07 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-06-03 12:46 ` Ofir Gal
2024-06-03 7:24 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-06-03 12:49 ` Ofir Gal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8d0c198f-9c15-4a8f-957a-2e4aecddd2e5@grimberg.me \
--to=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=christoph.boehmwalder@linbit.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=idryomov@gmail.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=lars.ellenberg@linbit.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ofir.gal@volumez.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=philipp.reisner@linbit.com \
--cc=xiubli@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox