public inbox for linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jirong Feng <jirong.feng@easystack.cn>
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, peng.xiao@easystack.cn
Subject: Re: Should NVME_SC_INVALID_NS be translated to BLK_STS_IOERR instead of BLK_STS_NOTSUPP so that multipath(both native and dm) can failover on the failure?
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2023 15:06:27 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8d53e40d-a725-4fb4-805e-1d1e009f83c4@easystack.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZW6yskpdzy8uAp3u@kbusch-mbp>

As far as I know, according to current implementation of function 
nvmet_parse_io_cmd() in drivers/nvme/target/core.c, nvmet_req_find_ns() 
is called before nvmet_check_ana_state(), so I believe currently nvmet 
is returning NVME_SC_INVALID_NS once namespace is disabled no matter if 
ANA is supported. In nvmet, a disabled namespace acts like it does not 
exist. nvmet_check_ana_state() requires req->ns, which is assigned in 
nvmet_req_find_ns(). If namespace is unknown, nvmet can't know the state 
of its ana group either.

So, to be better up to the specification, nvmet does need to 
differentiate a namespace is disabled or non-existent?

Moreover, even if nvmet returns NVME_SC_INVALID_FIELD to the host, the 
status code is still translated to BLK_STS_NOTSUPP, multipath won't 
retry either...


在 2023/12/5 13:18, Keith Busch 写道:
> On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 05:40:35AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 09:37:56PM -0700, Keith Busch wrote:
>>> So the controller through that path used to be able to access the
>>> Namespace, then suddenly lost ability to do so, but some other path can
>>> still access it if we retry on a failover/alternate path? I think your
>>> target is returning the wrong error code. It should be SCT/SC 303h,
>>> Asymmetric Access Persistent Loss (NVME_SC_ANA_TRANSITION), for what
>>> you're describing.
>> Yes, assuming ANA is actually supported by the controllers..
> Even without ANA, "Invalid Namespace" is still the wrong status code
> when dynamic namespace attachement is supported. If the namespace still
> exists in the subsystem but not attached to the controller processing a
> command (i.e. "inactive"), the return needs be Invalid Field in Command:
>
>    Specifying an inactive namespace identifier (refer to section 3.2.1.4)
>    in a command that uses the namespace identifier shall cause the
>    controller to abort the command with a status code of Invalid Field in
>    Command
>


  reply	other threads:[~2023-12-05  7:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-04  7:58 Should NVME_SC_INVALID_NS be translated to BLK_STS_IOERR instead of BLK_STS_NOTSUPP so that multipath(both native and dm) can failover on the failure? Jirong Feng
2023-12-04  8:47 ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-12-05  3:54   ` Jirong Feng
2023-12-05  4:37 ` Keith Busch
2023-12-05  4:40   ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-12-05  5:18     ` Keith Busch
2023-12-05  7:06       ` Jirong Feng [this message]
2023-12-05  8:50     ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-12-25 11:25       ` Jirong Feng
2023-12-25 11:40         ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-12-25 12:14           ` Jirong Feng
2023-12-26 13:27             ` Jirong Feng
2024-01-01  9:51               ` Sagi Grimberg
2024-01-02 10:33                 ` Jirong Feng
2024-01-02 12:46                   ` Sagi Grimberg
2024-01-03 10:24                     ` Jirong Feng
2024-01-04 11:56                       ` Sagi Grimberg
2024-01-30  9:36                         ` Jirong Feng
2024-01-30 11:29                           ` Sagi Grimberg
2024-01-31  6:25                             ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-03-20  3:17                               ` Jirong Feng
2024-03-20  8:51                                 ` Sagi Grimberg
2024-03-21  3:06                                   ` Jirong Feng
2024-04-07 22:28                                     ` Sagi Grimberg
2024-04-12  7:52                                       ` Jirong Feng
2024-04-12  8:57                                         ` Sagi Grimberg
2024-04-22  9:47                                           ` Sagi Grimberg
2024-04-23  3:15                                             ` Jirong Feng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8d53e40d-a725-4fb4-805e-1d1e009f83c4@easystack.cn \
    --to=jirong.feng@easystack.cn \
    --cc=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=peng.xiao@easystack.cn \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox