Linux-NVME Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: Wilfred Mallawa <wilfred.opensource@gmail.com>,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme/tcp: handle tls partially sent records in write_space()
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2025 11:51:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8e5a3ff3-d17a-488f-97fb-3904684edb47@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <339cbb66fbcd78d639d0d8463a3a67daf089f40d.camel@gmail.com>

On 10/7/25 11:24, Wilfred Mallawa wrote:
> On Tue, 2025-10-07 at 07:19 +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> On 10/7/25 02:46, Wilfred Mallawa wrote:
>>> From: Wilfred Mallawa <wilfred.mallawa@wdc.com>
>>>
>>
> [...]
>> I wonder: Do we really need to check for a partially assembled
>> record,
>> or wouldn't it be easier to call queue->write_space() every time
>> here?
>> We sure would end up with executing the callback more often, but if
>> no
>> data is present it shouldn't do any harm.
>>
>> IE just use
>>
>> if (nvme_tcp_queue_tls(queue)
>>       queue->write_space(sk);
> 
> Hey Hannes,
> 
> This was my initial approach, but I figured using
> tls_is_partially_sent_record() might be slightly more efficient. But if
> we think that's negligible, happy to go with this approach (omitting
> the partial record check).
> 
Please do.
Performance testing on NVMe-TCP is notoriously tricky, so for now we
really should not assume anything here.
And it's making the patch _vastly_ simpler, _and_ we don't have to
involve the networking folks here.
We have a similar patch for the data_ready() function in nvmet_tcp(),
and that seemed to work, too.
Nit: we don't unset the 'NOSPACE' flag there. Can you check if that's
really required? And, if it is, fixup nvmet_tcp() to unset it?
Or, if not, modify your patch to not clear it?

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke                  Kernel Storage Architect
hare@suse.de                                +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Frankenstr. 146, 90461 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), GF: I. Totev, A. McDonald, W. Knoblich


  reply	other threads:[~2025-10-07  9:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-07  0:46 [PATCH] nvme/tcp: handle tls partially sent records in write_space() Wilfred Mallawa
2025-10-07  5:19 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-10-07  9:24   ` Wilfred Mallawa
2025-10-07  9:51     ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2025-10-08  2:11       ` Wilfred Mallawa
2025-10-08  6:28         ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-10-09 21:36 ` kernel test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8e5a3ff3-d17a-488f-97fb-3904684edb47@suse.de \
    --to=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    --cc=sd@queasysnail.net \
    --cc=wilfred.opensource@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox