From: Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanyak@nvidia.com>
To: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
"linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <Chaitanya.Kulkarni@wdc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvmet: fix a possible leak when destroy a ctrl during qp establishment
Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 19:15:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <910fe0fa-f783-45a1-b45f-be973d748fda@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240527193852.252090-1-sagi@grimberg.me>
On 5/27/24 12:38, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> In nvmet_sq_destroy we capture sq->ctrl early and if it is non-NULL we
> know that a ctrl was allocated (in the admin connect request handler)
> and we need to release pending AERs, clear ctrl->sqs and sq->ctrl
> (for nvme-loop primarily), and drop the final reference on the ctrl.
>
> However, a small window is possible where nvmet_sq_destroy starts (as
> a result of the client giving up and disconnecting) concurrently with
> the nvme admin connect cmd (which may be in an early stage). But *before*
> kill_and_confirm of sq->ref (i.e. the admin connect managed to get an sq
> live reference). In this case, sq->ctrl was allocated however after it was
> captured in a local variable in nvmet_sq_destroy.
> This prevented the final reference drop on the ctrl.
>
> Solve this by re-capturing the sq->ctrl after all inflight request has
> completed, where for sure sq->ctrl reference is final, and move forward
> based on that.
>
> This issue was observed in an environment with many hosts connecting
> multiple ctrls simoutanuosly, creating a delay in allocating a ctrl
> leading up to this race window.
>
> Reported-by: Alex Turin <alex@vastdata.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
> ---
>
thanks a lot for fixing this.
FWIW Looks good.
Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>
-ck
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-29 19:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-27 19:38 [PATCH] nvmet: fix a possible leak when destroy a ctrl during qp establishment Sagi Grimberg
2024-05-28 6:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-05-28 17:14 ` Keith Busch
2024-05-29 19:15 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=910fe0fa-f783-45a1-b45f-be973d748fda@nvidia.com \
--to=chaitanyak@nvidia.com \
--cc=Chaitanya.Kulkarni@wdc.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox