From: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, Martin Wilck <mwilck@suse.com>,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@wdc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] nvme-multipath: do not fall back to __nvme_find_path() for non-optimized paths
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 23:43:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9897ca64-5dfd-78dc-ae75-72ecc3578d77@grimberg.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <25b94bcf-1730-da16-6a1f-b68ffa4b8970@suse.de>
>>> When nvme_round_robin_path() finds a valid namespace we should be
>>> using it;
>>> falling back to __nvme_find_path() for non-optimized paths will cause
>>> the
>>> result from nvme_round_robin_path() to be ignored for non-optimized
>>> paths.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Martin Wilck <mwilck@suse.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/nvme/host/multipath.c | 5 ++++-
>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/multipath.c
>>> b/drivers/nvme/host/multipath.c
>>> index fe8f7f123fac..97d3c19b5684 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/multipath.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/multipath.c
>>> @@ -272,8 +272,11 @@ inline struct nvme_ns *nvme_find_path(struct
>>> nvme_ns_head *head)
>>> struct nvme_ns *ns;
>>> ns = srcu_dereference(head->current_path[node], &head->srcu);
>>> - if (READ_ONCE(head->subsys->iopolicy) == NVME_IOPOLICY_RR && ns)
>>> + if (READ_ONCE(head->subsys->iopolicy) == NVME_IOPOLICY_RR && ns) {
>>> ns = nvme_round_robin_path(head, node, ns);
>>> + if (ns)
>>> + return ns;
>>> + }
>>> if (unlikely(!ns || !nvme_path_is_optimized(ns)))
>>> ns = __nvme_find_path(head, node);
>>
>> Maybe instead of the early return put the following condition on else?
>
> That depends on whether we want to have a fallback to __nvme_find_path()
> or not. With your suggestion we would lose that; I'd rather keep it.
OK...
Reviewed-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvme mailing list
Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-28 6:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-27 16:08 [PATCH 0/2] nvme-multipath: fixes for non-optimized paths Hannes Reinecke
2020-07-27 16:08 ` [PATCH 1/2] nvme-multipath: fix logic " Hannes Reinecke
2020-07-27 19:42 ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-07-27 16:08 ` [PATCH 2/2] nvme-multipath: do not fall back to __nvme_find_path() " Hannes Reinecke
2020-07-27 19:46 ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-07-28 6:25 ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-07-28 6:43 ` Sagi Grimberg [this message]
2020-07-28 8:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-07-28 8:14 ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-07-28 8:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-07-28 8:18 ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-07-28 10:51 ` [PATCH 0/2] nvme-multipath: fixes " Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9897ca64-5dfd-78dc-ae75-72ecc3578d77@grimberg.me \
--to=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=keith.busch@wdc.com \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mwilck@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox