From: 许春光 <brookxu.cn@gmail.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: kbusch@kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk, hch@lst.de, sagi@grimberg.me,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] nvme-tcp: fix hung issues for deleting
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2023 12:09:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CADtkEeeVWZ_b9mDWzwaq_5hdfZ53-RX2rd1SDDem=YsSBQ_g8A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZH9NcBtrDxwq5xRU@ovpn-8-17.pek2.redhat.com>
Hi Ming:
Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> 于2023年6月6日周二 23:15写道:
>
> Hello Chunguang,
>
> On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 06:59:22PM +0800, brookxu.cn wrote:
> > From: Chunguang Xu <chunguang.xu@shopee.com>
> >
> > We found that nvme_remove_namespaces() may hang in flush_work(&ctrl->scan_work)
> > while removing ctrl. The root cause may due to the state of ctrl changed to
> > NVME_CTRL_DELETING while removing ctrl , which intterupt nvme_tcp_error_recovery_work()/
> > nvme_reset_ctrl_work()/nvme_tcp_reconnect_or_remove(). At this time, ctrl is
>
> I didn't dig into ctrl state check in these error handler yet, but error
> handling is supposed to provide forward progress for any controller state.
>
> Can you explain a bit how switching to DELETING interrupts the above
> error handling and breaks the forward progress guarantee?
Here we freezed ctrl, if ctrl state has changed to DELETING or
DELETING_NIO(by nvme disconnect), we will break up and lease ctrl
freeze, so nvme_remove_namespaces() hang.
static void nvme_tcp_error_recovery_work(struct work_struct *work)
{
...
if (!nvme_change_ctrl_state(ctrl, NVME_CTRL_CONNECTING)) {
/* state change failure is ok if we started ctrl delete */
WARN_ON_ONCE(ctrl->state != NVME_CTRL_DELETING &&
ctrl->state != NVME_CTRL_DELETING_NOIO);
return;
}
nvme_tcp_reconnect_or_remove(ctrl);
}
Another path, we will check ctrl state while reconnecting, if it changes to
DELETING or DELETING_NIO, we will break up and lease ctrl freeze and
queue quiescing (through reset path), as a result Hang occurs.
static void nvme_tcp_reconnect_or_remove(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl)
{
/* If we are resetting/deleting then do nothing */
if (ctrl->state != NVME_CTRL_CONNECTING) {
WARN_ON_ONCE(ctrl->state == NVME_CTRL_NEW ||
ctrl->state == NVME_CTRL_LIVE);
return;
}
...
}
> > freezed and queue is quiescing . Since scan_work may continue to issue IOs to
> > load partition table, make it blocked, and lead to nvme_tcp_error_recovery_work()
> > hang in flush_work(&ctrl->scan_work).
> >
> > After analyzation, we found that there are mainly two case:
> > 1. Since ctrl is freeze, scan_work hang in __bio_queue_enter() while it issue
> > new IO to load partition table.
>
> Yeah, nvme freeze usage is fragile, and I suggested to move
> nvme_start_freeze() from nvme_tcp_teardown_io_queues to
> nvme_tcp_configure_io_queues(), such as the posted change on rdma:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/CAHj4cs-4gQHnp5aiekvJmb6o8qAcb6nLV61uOGFiisCzM49_dg@mail.gmail.com/T/#ma0d6bbfaa0c8c1be79738ff86a2fdcf7582e06b0
While drive reconnecting, I think we should freeze ctrl or quiescing queue,
otherwise nvme_fail_nonready_command()may return BLK_STS_RESOURCE,
and the IOs may retry frequently. So I think we may better freeze ctrl
while entering
error_recovery/reconnect, but need to unfreeze it while exit.
> > 2. Since queus is quiescing, requeue timeouted IO may hang in hctx->dispatch
> > queue, leading scan_work waiting for IO completion.
>
> That still looks one problem in related error handling code, which is
> supposed to recover and unquiesce queue finally.
If I have not misunderstood that is what this patchset does.
Thanks.
>
> Thanks,
> Ming
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-07 4:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-29 10:59 [RFC PATCH 0/4] nvme-tcp: fix hung issues for deleting brookxu.cn
2023-05-29 10:59 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] nvme: unfreeze while exit from recovery or resetting brookxu.cn
2023-05-29 10:59 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] nvme: donot retry request for NVME_CTRL_DELETING_NOIO brookxu.cn
2023-05-29 10:59 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] nvme: optimize nvme_check_ready() " brookxu.cn
2023-05-29 10:59 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] nvme-tcp: remove admin_q quiescing from nvme_tcp_teardown_io_queues brookxu.cn
2023-06-05 23:09 ` [RFC PATCH 0/4] nvme-tcp: fix hung issues for deleting Sagi Grimberg
2023-06-06 14:32 ` 许春光
2023-06-06 14:41 ` 许春光
2023-06-06 15:14 ` Ming Lei
2023-06-07 4:09 ` 许春光 [this message]
2023-06-08 0:56 ` Ming Lei
2023-06-08 2:48 ` 许春光
2023-06-08 13:51 ` Ming Lei
2023-06-09 3:17 ` 许春光
2023-06-09 3:23 ` 许春光
2023-06-11 8:11 ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-06-12 1:33 ` Ming Lei
2023-06-12 6:36 ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-06-13 1:01 ` Ming Lei
2023-06-12 8:24 ` 许春光
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CADtkEeeVWZ_b9mDWzwaq_5hdfZ53-RX2rd1SDDem=YsSBQ_g8A@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=brookxu.cn@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).