public inbox for linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Maurizio Lombardi" <mlombard@bsdbackstore.eu>
To: "zhang.guanghui@cestc.cn" <zhang.guanghui@cestc.cn>,
	"chunguang.xu" <chunguang.xu@shopee.com>
Cc: "mgurtovoy" <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com>, "sagi" <sagi@grimberg.me>,
	"kbusch" <kbusch@kernel.org>, "sashal" <sashal@kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-nvme" <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-block" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: nvme-tcp: fix a possible UAF when failing to send request
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 09:11:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <D7QBDBZMZTCI.1W40WVL5JJ3O7@bsdbackstore.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202502111604342976121@cestc.cn>

On Tue Feb 11, 2025 at 9:04 AM CET, zhang.guanghui@cestc.cn wrote:
> Hi 
>
>     This is a  race issue,  I can't reproduce it stably yet. I have not tested the latest kernel.  but in fact,  I've synced some nvme-tcp patches from  lastest upstream,

Hello, could you try this patch?

queue_lock should protect against concurrent "error recovery",
while send_mutex should serialize try_recv() and try_send(), emulating
the way io_work works.
Concurrent calls to try_recv() should already be protected by
sock_lock.

diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c b/drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c
index 841238f38fdd..f464de04ff4d 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c
@@ -2653,16 +2653,24 @@ static int nvme_tcp_poll(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, struct io_comp_batch *iob)
 {
 	struct nvme_tcp_queue *queue = hctx->driver_data;
 	struct sock *sk = queue->sock->sk;
+	int r = 0;
 
+	mutex_lock(&queue->queue_lock);
 	if (!test_bit(NVME_TCP_Q_LIVE, &queue->flags))
-		return 0;
+		goto out;
 
 	set_bit(NVME_TCP_Q_POLLING, &queue->flags);
 	if (sk_can_busy_loop(sk) && skb_queue_empty_lockless(&sk->sk_receive_queue))
 		sk_busy_loop(sk, true);
+
+	mutex_lock(&queue->send_mutex);
 	nvme_tcp_try_recv(queue);
+	r = queue->nr_cqe;
+	mutex_unlock(&queue->send_mutex);
 	clear_bit(NVME_TCP_Q_POLLING, &queue->flags);
-	return queue->nr_cqe;
+out:
+	mutex_unlock(&queue->queue_lock);
+	return r;
 }
 
 static int nvme_tcp_get_address(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl, char *buf, int size)


Thanks,
Maurizio


  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-12  8:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-10  7:41 nvme-tcp: fix a possible UAF when failing to send request zhang.guanghui
2025-02-10 10:01 ` Maurizio Lombardi
2025-02-10 10:24   ` Max Gurtovoy
2025-02-10 11:16     ` zhang.guanghui
2025-02-10 11:34       ` Max Gurtovoy
2025-02-10 16:40     ` Maurizio Lombardi
     [not found]       ` <CAAO4dAWdsMjYMp9jdWXd_48aG0mTtVpRONqjJJ1scnc773tHzg@mail.gmail.com>
2025-02-11  8:04         ` zhang.guanghui
2025-02-12  8:11           ` Maurizio Lombardi [this message]
2025-02-12  8:23             ` Maurizio Lombardi
2025-02-12  8:52             ` Maurizio Lombardi
2025-02-12  9:47               ` zhang.guanghui
2025-02-12 10:28                 ` Maurizio Lombardi
2025-02-12 11:14                   ` Maurizio Lombardi
2025-02-12 11:47                     ` Maurizio Lombardi
2025-02-12 15:33 ` Maurizio Lombardi
2025-02-12 16:07   ` Maurizio Lombardi
2025-02-13  2:04     ` zhang.guanghui
2025-02-17  7:46 ` Sagi Grimberg
2025-02-20  8:20   ` zhang.guanghui
2025-03-07 10:10   ` Re: nvme-tcp: fix a possible UAF when failing to send request【请注意,邮件由sagigrim@gmail.com代发】 zhang.guanghui
2025-03-11 10:52     ` Maurizio Lombardi
2025-03-13  1:48       ` zhang.guanghui
2025-03-13  7:51         ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-03-13  8:18           ` zhang.guanghui
     [not found]             ` <2025031316313196627826@cestc.cn>
2025-03-13  9:01               ` Maurizio Lombardi
2025-03-13  8:38           ` zhang.guanghui
2025-03-28  9:24       ` Re: nvme-tcp: fix a possible UAF when failing to send request zhang.guanghui
2025-04-01 12:11         ` Maurizio Lombardi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=D7QBDBZMZTCI.1W40WVL5JJ3O7@bsdbackstore.eu \
    --to=mlombard@bsdbackstore.eu \
    --cc=chunguang.xu@shopee.com \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mgurtovoy@nvidia.com \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    --cc=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=zhang.guanghui@cestc.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox