Linux-NVME Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Maurizio Lombardi" <mlombard@bsdbackstore.eu>
To: "Hannes Reinecke" <hare@suse.de>,
	"Maurizio Lombardi" <mlombard@redhat.com>, <kbusch@kernel.org>
Cc: <axboe@kernel.dk>, <hch@lst.de>, <sagi@grimberg.me>,
	<linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>, <hare@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme-tcp: add basic support for the C2HTermReq PDU
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 17:48:38 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <D80TVRHC1LFG.RHYVKMPXX3DF@bsdbackstore.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0e3af565-f8e6-4647-89c3-6757f6bae3a6@suse.de>

On Mon Feb 24, 2025 at 5:04 PM CET, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> I really wouldn't be doing that, as we need to terminate the queue upon
> fatal error and don't really want to delay that (eg by waiting for the
> transfer to finish) and

I did some tests and it seems to work with MSG_DONTWAIT as well.

I am just wondering if calling kernel_sock_shutdown() could
in some cases race with MSG_DONTWAIT, preventing the packet from
being effectively sent.
Not a big problem anyway because, as you said, it's a kind
of best-effort thing.

Maurizio


  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-24 16:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-14 19:00 [PATCH] nvme-tcp: add basic support for the C2HTermReq PDU Maurizio Lombardi
2025-02-17  8:14 ` Sagi Grimberg
2025-02-17 13:26   ` Maurizio Lombardi
2025-02-17 10:56 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-02-17 13:29   ` Maurizio Lombardi
2025-02-24 14:38   ` Maurizio Lombardi
2025-02-24 16:04     ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-02-24 16:48       ` Maurizio Lombardi [this message]
2025-02-24 17:03         ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-02-25  7:41           ` Sagi Grimberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=D80TVRHC1LFG.RHYVKMPXX3DF@bsdbackstore.eu \
    --to=mlombard@bsdbackstore.eu \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hare@kernel.org \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mlombard@redhat.com \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox