From: "Maurizio Lombardi" <mlombard@arkamax.eu>
To: "Chao Shi" <coshi036@gmail.com>,
"Keith Busch" <kbusch@kernel.org>, "Jens Axboe" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@lst.de>,
"Sagi Grimberg" <sagi@grimberg.me>,
"Daniel Wagner" <dwagner@suse.de>,
"Hannes Reinecke" <hare@suse.de>,
<linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "Sungwoo Kim" <iam@sung-woo.kim>, "Dave Tian" <daveti@purdue.edu>,
"Weidong Zhu" <weizhu@fiu.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme: core: reject invalid LBA data size from Identify Namespace
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2026 14:22:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DHXZ8MK1AASK.VWC6067TNS7Q@arkamax.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260418042835.420281-1-coshi036@gmail.com>
On Sat Apr 18, 2026 at 6:28 AM CEST, Chao Shi wrote:
> nvme_update_ns_info_block() trusts id->lbaf[lbaf].ds from the
> controller and assigns it directly to ns->head->lba_shift without
> bounds checking. nvme_lba_to_sect() then does:
>
> return lba << (head->lba_shift - SECTOR_SHIFT);
>
> When called with lba = le64_to_cpu(id->nsze) to compute the device
> capacity, an attacker-controlled controller can choose ds < 9 or a
> combination of (ds, nsze) that makes the left shift overflow
> sector_t. The former is a C undefined behaviour that UBSAN reports
> as a BUG; the latter silently yields a bogus capacity that the
> block layer then trusts for bounds checking.
>
> Validate ds against SECTOR_SHIFT and use check_shl_overflow() to
> compute capacity so that any (ds, nsze) combination that would
> overflow sector_t is rejected. The namespace is skipped with -EIO
> instead of crashing the kernel. This is reachable by a malicious
> NVMe device, a buggy firmware, or an attacker-controlled NVMe-oF
> target.
>
> Stack trace (UBSAN, ds < 9 variant):
>
> RIP: nvme_lba_to_sect drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h:699 [inline]
> RIP: nvme_update_ns_info_block.cold+0x5/0x7
> Call Trace:
> nvme_update_ns_info+0x175/0xd90 drivers/nvme/host/core.c:2467
> nvme_validate_ns drivers/nvme/host/core.c:4299 [inline]
> nvme_scan_ns drivers/nvme/host/core.c:4350
> nvme_scan_ns_async+0xa5/0xe0 drivers/nvme/host/core.c:4383
> async_run_entry_fn
> process_one_work
> worker_thread
> kthread
>
> Found by Syzkaller.
>
> Fixes: 9419e71b8d67 ("nvme: move ns id info to struct nvme_ns_head")
> Acked-by: Sungwoo Kim <iam@sung-woo.kim>
> Acked-by: Dave Tian <daveti@purdue.edu>
> Acked-by: Weidong Zhu <weizhu@fiu.edu>
> Signed-off-by: Chao Shi <coshi036@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/nvme/host/core.c | 12 +++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> index 1e33af94c24..9b3bf3e4075 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> @@ -2407,9 +2407,19 @@ static int nvme_update_ns_info_block(struct nvme_ns *ns,
> lim = queue_limits_start_update(ns->disk->queue);
>
> memflags = blk_mq_freeze_queue(ns->disk->queue);
> + if (id->lbaf[lbaf].ds < SECTOR_SHIFT ||
> + check_shl_overflow(le64_to_cpu(id->nsze),
> + id->lbaf[lbaf].ds - SECTOR_SHIFT,
> + &capacity)) {
> + dev_warn_once(ns->ctrl->device,
> + "invalid LBA data size %u, skipping namespace\n",
> + id->lbaf[lbaf].ds);
Just a nit:
If I'm reading the NVMe spec correctly, ds == 0 has a special meaning:
'LBA format is not currently available.'
maybe we should use a different dev_warn() for ds == 0 ?
Maurizio
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-20 12:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-18 4:28 [PATCH] nvme: core: reject invalid LBA data size from Identify Namespace Chao Shi
2026-04-20 12:22 ` Daniel Wagner
2026-04-20 14:54 ` Keith Busch
2026-04-20 12:22 ` Maurizio Lombardi [this message]
2026-04-20 14:51 ` Keith Busch
2026-04-20 23:11 ` [PATCH v2 0/1] " Chao Shi
2026-04-20 23:11 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] " Chao Shi
2026-04-21 0:25 ` [PATCH v2 0/1] " Keith Busch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DHXZ8MK1AASK.VWC6067TNS7Q@arkamax.eu \
--to=mlombard@arkamax.eu \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=coshi036@gmail.com \
--cc=daveti@purdue.edu \
--cc=dwagner@suse.de \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=iam@sung-woo.kim \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=weizhu@fiu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox