public inbox for linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Maurizio Lombardi" <mlombard@arkamax.eu>
To: "Chao Shi" <coshi036@gmail.com>,
	"Keith Busch" <kbusch@kernel.org>, "Jens Axboe" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@lst.de>,
	"Sagi Grimberg" <sagi@grimberg.me>,
	"Daniel Wagner" <dwagner@suse.de>,
	"Hannes Reinecke" <hare@suse.de>,
	<linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "Sungwoo Kim" <iam@sung-woo.kim>, "Dave Tian" <daveti@purdue.edu>,
	"Weidong Zhu" <weizhu@fiu.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme: core: reject invalid LBA data size from Identify Namespace
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2026 14:22:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DHXZ8MK1AASK.VWC6067TNS7Q@arkamax.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260418042835.420281-1-coshi036@gmail.com>

On Sat Apr 18, 2026 at 6:28 AM CEST, Chao Shi wrote:
> nvme_update_ns_info_block() trusts id->lbaf[lbaf].ds from the
> controller and assigns it directly to ns->head->lba_shift without
> bounds checking.  nvme_lba_to_sect() then does:
>
>     return lba << (head->lba_shift - SECTOR_SHIFT);
>
> When called with lba = le64_to_cpu(id->nsze) to compute the device
> capacity, an attacker-controlled controller can choose ds < 9 or a
> combination of (ds, nsze) that makes the left shift overflow
> sector_t.  The former is a C undefined behaviour that UBSAN reports
> as a BUG; the latter silently yields a bogus capacity that the
> block layer then trusts for bounds checking.
>
> Validate ds against SECTOR_SHIFT and use check_shl_overflow() to
> compute capacity so that any (ds, nsze) combination that would
> overflow sector_t is rejected.  The namespace is skipped with -EIO
> instead of crashing the kernel.  This is reachable by a malicious
> NVMe device, a buggy firmware, or an attacker-controlled NVMe-oF
> target.
>
> Stack trace (UBSAN, ds < 9 variant):
>
>   RIP: nvme_lba_to_sect drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h:699 [inline]
>   RIP: nvme_update_ns_info_block.cold+0x5/0x7
>   Call Trace:
>    nvme_update_ns_info+0x175/0xd90 drivers/nvme/host/core.c:2467
>    nvme_validate_ns drivers/nvme/host/core.c:4299 [inline]
>    nvme_scan_ns drivers/nvme/host/core.c:4350
>    nvme_scan_ns_async+0xa5/0xe0 drivers/nvme/host/core.c:4383
>    async_run_entry_fn
>    process_one_work
>    worker_thread
>    kthread
>
> Found by Syzkaller.
>
> Fixes: 9419e71b8d67 ("nvme: move ns id info to struct nvme_ns_head")
> Acked-by: Sungwoo Kim <iam@sung-woo.kim>
> Acked-by: Dave Tian <daveti@purdue.edu>
> Acked-by: Weidong Zhu <weizhu@fiu.edu>
> Signed-off-by: Chao Shi <coshi036@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/nvme/host/core.c | 12 +++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> index 1e33af94c24..9b3bf3e4075 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> @@ -2407,9 +2407,19 @@ static int nvme_update_ns_info_block(struct nvme_ns *ns,
>  	lim = queue_limits_start_update(ns->disk->queue);
>  
>  	memflags = blk_mq_freeze_queue(ns->disk->queue);
> +	if (id->lbaf[lbaf].ds < SECTOR_SHIFT ||
> +	    check_shl_overflow(le64_to_cpu(id->nsze),
> +			       id->lbaf[lbaf].ds - SECTOR_SHIFT,
> +			       &capacity)) {
> +		dev_warn_once(ns->ctrl->device,
> +			"invalid LBA data size %u, skipping namespace\n",
> +			id->lbaf[lbaf].ds);

Just a nit:

If I'm reading the NVMe spec correctly, ds == 0 has a special meaning:
'LBA format is not currently available.'
maybe we should use a different dev_warn() for ds == 0 ?

Maurizio



  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-04-20 12:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-18  4:28 [PATCH] nvme: core: reject invalid LBA data size from Identify Namespace Chao Shi
2026-04-20 12:22 ` Daniel Wagner
2026-04-20 14:54   ` Keith Busch
2026-04-20 12:22 ` Maurizio Lombardi [this message]
2026-04-20 14:51 ` Keith Busch
2026-04-20 23:11 ` [PATCH v2 0/1] " Chao Shi
2026-04-20 23:11   ` [PATCH v2 1/1] " Chao Shi
2026-04-21  0:25   ` [PATCH v2 0/1] " Keith Busch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DHXZ8MK1AASK.VWC6067TNS7Q@arkamax.eu \
    --to=mlombard@arkamax.eu \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=coshi036@gmail.com \
    --cc=daveti@purdue.edu \
    --cc=dwagner@suse.de \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=iam@sung-woo.kim \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    --cc=weizhu@fiu.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox