Linux-NVME Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Maurizio Lombardi" <mlombard@arkamax.eu>
To: "Geliang Tang" <geliang@kernel.org>,
	"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@lst.de>,
	"Sagi Grimberg" <sagi@grimberg.me>,
	"Chaitanya Kulkarni" <kch@nvidia.com>,
	"Hannes Reinecke" <hare@suse.de>,
	"Keith Busch" <kbusch@kernel.org>,
	"Maurizio Lombardi" <mlombard@redhat.com>,
	"John Meneghini" <jmeneghi@redhat.com>
Cc: "Geliang Tang" <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>,
	<linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] nvmet-tcp: remove duplicate cancel_work_sync in release_queue_work
Date: Tue, 19 May 2026 08:39:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DIMG40N1AP7Y.YMM2POCWCLN3@arkamax.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <246690f4c28333cc83f63081a36b85174465c9b7.1779170418.git.tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>

On Tue May 19, 2026 at 8:10 AM CEST, Geliang Tang wrote:
> From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
>
> The cancel_work_sync(&queue->io_work) is called twice in
> nvmet_tcp_release_queue_work(). Remove the second one as it is redundant.
>
> Fixes: a208fc5672177 ("nvmet-tcp: fix a race condition between release_queue and io_work")
> Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
> ---
>  drivers/nvme/target/tcp.c | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/target/tcp.c b/drivers/nvme/target/tcp.c
> index 8a243d22a511..af7ce384b3cf 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/target/tcp.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/target/tcp.c
> @@ -1616,7 +1616,6 @@ static void nvmet_tcp_release_queue_work(struct work_struct *w)
>  	nvmet_tcp_uninit_data_in_cmds(queue);
>  	nvmet_sq_destroy(&queue->nvme_sq);
>  	nvmet_cq_put(&queue->nvme_cq);
> -	cancel_work_sync(&queue->io_work);
>  	nvmet_tcp_free_cmd_data_in_buffers(queue);
>  	/* ->sock will be released by fput() */
>  	fput(queue->sock->file);

I think that the second cancel_work_sync() is done because
nvmet_sq_destroy() can potentially end up calling
nvmet_req_complete()

nvmet_sq_destroy() -> nvmet_async_events_failall() ->
nvmet_req_complete() -> queue_response()

and this kicks a new io_work.

Maurizio


  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-19  6:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-19  6:10 [PATCH 0/2] nvmet-tcp: two small fixes Geliang Tang
2026-05-19  6:10 ` [PATCH 1/2] nvmet-tcp: check return value of nvmet_tcp_set_queue_sock Geliang Tang
2026-05-19  8:44   ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-05-19  6:10 ` [PATCH 2/2] nvmet-tcp: remove duplicate cancel_work_sync in release_queue_work Geliang Tang
2026-05-19  6:39   ` Maurizio Lombardi [this message]
2026-05-19  7:52     ` Geliang Tang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DIMG40N1AP7Y.YMM2POCWCLN3@arkamax.eu \
    --to=mlombard@arkamax.eu \
    --cc=geliang@kernel.org \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jmeneghi@redhat.com \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=kch@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mlombard@redhat.com \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    --cc=tanggeliang@kylinos.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox