From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77DB1C982D7 for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2026 07:58:04 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:References:To: From:Subject:Cc:Message-Id:Date:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Mime-Version:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=0HqoWMrXdNO5OfQgnTTPtNIXED40IV8fU6rDuuYARqI=; b=AQMC2P4/Ghl8javV4/SAqHrXVA GF241JaITte43RBxcKeSnVEym7UpsyqhC9/Sq5P9wAqeKBrKtTUNUwZzP7NAZFqLnnOmmSs9z6FR2 VeAGMkQUoM0ZKwckc0UbGoBMA5C1v/sO73MlFdUNuNBS4zJAt+P5y1v8rsoVcz0pxORREiAPCQCKU L64BfpHo0tfZOcR/UVrwhGFFkXFhlHSKepUboDqvF46EZBuU0lq5A6Dbl6brERtdNWQmJclUmG1Wb a5wiPQ40nuTtxts+NFdRPxuaDhGNOXGf4w9veQoDgJIOiH7qNDj9Iovxp64OlsALvUrwBppYDQdDc vix2jp+A==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1x7pxT-0000000G5Sx-0brr; Sat, 19 Sep 2026 07:58:03 +0000 Received: from 128-116-240-228.dyn.eolo.it ([128.116.240.228] helo=arkamax.eu) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1x7pxQ-0000000G5Se-3RXo for linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org; Sat, 19 Sep 2026 07:58:02 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; s=mail1; bh=0HqoWMrXdNO5Of QgnTTPtNIXED40IV8fU6rDuuYARqI=; h=in-reply-to:references:to:from: subject:cc:date; d=arkamax.eu; b=dyeQMdacFdNOkNT3Q+GqDPR/AfxG96L3SIDuX xYuEouDjAdGBjBDnQ/S7PcPSRDci0dDce6PWljneC89Wtqh8WVEB2U8QSLggQVxrr2JoZ6 cKqx4Qn64itO89S1+kqM/0yGT/Mk4rIlJ8AUP6nBxoluudCn8OnLXQNbhbNxc/JiDJNjMY q18Hj8PxSWUy124OVpPyufssRMwchD3NKHnB44wZF8DcqWYu3Ocec4CMRSpKfk73l7jeKK kQs6lDT8DQ0JvNVptYepomm6jZ8M4nDCihJzqI5Qh7PnHWBrSrSmfcEFFvBRUJ3tmSSCws 6NvIdCSzV1ozV/pZmER3Y3Fow== Received: from localhost (128-116-240-228.dyn.eolo.it [128.116.240.228]) by arkamax.eu (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 0d7dc368 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); Sat, 19 Sep 2026 09:57:58 +0200 (CEST) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2026 09:57:58 +0200 Message-Id: Cc: , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] nvmet-tcp: report a bounded MDTS instead of "no limit" From: "Maurizio Lombardi" To: "Maurizio Lombardi" , "Ing. Alfonso Kuen Arroyo" X-Mailer: aerc 0.22.0 References: <178978683646.43804.6940923486189370705@idkmanager.com> In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.9.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20260919_005801_200699_A9CFDE92 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 6.16 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "Linux-nvme" Errors-To: linux-nvme-bounces+linux-nvme=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Sat Sep 19, 2026 at 9:53 AM CEST, Maurizio Lombardi wrote: > > Yes, but your patch sets NVMET_RDMA_MAX_MDTS to 8, which means 1MiB, not > 4MiB, so a 2MiB command should be rejected, even if it's under the MAXH2C= DATA > limit of 4MiB; or am I missing something? > Typo, I meant NVMET_TCP_MAX_MDTS, not NVMET_RDMA_MAX_MDTS. Maurizio