From: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] nvme: store the actual queue size in ctrl->sqsize
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2022 10:02:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y6x2rcIhPhQtYQ4p@kbusch-mbp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221225103234.226794-4-hch@lst.de>
On Sun, Dec 25, 2022 at 11:32:33AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Convert from the strange on the wire 0s based value to a regular size
> when reading the filed to avoid adjustments all over.
s/filed/field
> @@ -3242,7 +3242,8 @@ int nvme_init_ctrl_finish(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl, bool was_suspended)
> return ret;
> }
>
> - ctrl->sqsize = min_t(u16, NVME_CAP_MQES(ctrl->cap), ctrl->sqsize);
> + /* CAP.MQES is 0s based */
> + ctrl->sqsize = min_t(u16, NVME_CAP_MQES(ctrl->cap) - 1, ctrl->sqsize);
Did you mean '+ 1' instead of '- 1'? The minimum MQES value per spec is
1, giving 2 slots. Subtracting 1 from that possible value would give you
sqsize 0.
But I'm confused why this is being changed. The ctrl->sqsize isn't a 0's
based value. It's normal 1-based value that tells blk-mq how many tags
to allocate.
> +static ssize_t sqsize_show(struct device *dev,
> + struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> +{
> + struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +
> + /* Report the 0s based register value for historic reasons: */
> + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d\n", ctrl->sqsize - 1);
> +}
Weird indentation here.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-28 17:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-25 10:32 fix nvme sqsize on off regression Christoph Hellwig
2022-12-25 10:32 ` [PATCH 1/4] nvme: fix setting the queue depth in nvme_alloc_io_tag_set Christoph Hellwig
2022-12-25 10:51 ` Sagi Grimberg
2022-12-25 10:53 ` Sagi Grimberg
2022-12-28 16:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-12-25 21:15 ` Hugh Dickins
2022-12-25 10:32 ` [PATCH 2/4] nvme-pci: update sqsize when adjusting the queue depth Christoph Hellwig
2022-12-25 11:19 ` Sagi Grimberg
2022-12-28 16:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-12-29 12:07 ` Sagi Grimberg
2022-12-29 16:34 ` Keith Busch
2023-01-02 9:39 ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-01-03 16:45 ` Keith Busch
2022-12-25 21:21 ` Hugh Dickins
2022-12-25 10:32 ` [PATCH 3/4] nvme: store the actual queue size in ctrl->sqsize Christoph Hellwig
2022-12-25 11:09 ` Sagi Grimberg
2022-12-28 17:02 ` Keith Busch [this message]
2022-12-25 10:32 ` [PATCH 4/4] nvme-pci: remove the dev->q_depth field Christoph Hellwig
2022-12-25 11:19 ` Sagi Grimberg
2022-12-26 19:11 ` (subset) fix nvme sqsize on off regression Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y6x2rcIhPhQtYQ4p@kbusch-mbp \
--to=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox