public inbox for linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] blk-mq: add helper of blk_mq_global_quiesce_wait()
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 10:33:08 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YaWNZF3ZYWPQBSbk@T590> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a3ea006a-738b-af69-4dd5-f33444e3559d@grimberg.me>

On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 11:00:45AM +0200, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> 
> > > > > > Add helper of blk_mq_global_quiesce_wait() for supporting to quiesce
> > > > > > queues in parallel, then we can just wait once if global quiesce wait
> > > > > > is allowed.
> > > > > 
> > > > > blk_mq_global_quiesce_wait() is a poor name... global is scope-less and
> > > > > obviously it has a scope.
> > > > 
> > > > How about blk_mq_shared_quiesce_wait()? or any suggestion?
> > > 
> > > Shared between what?
> > 
> > All request queues in one host-wide, both scsi and nvme has such
> > requirement.
> > 
> > > 
> > > Maybe if the queue has a non-blocking tagset, it can have a "quiesced"
> > > flag that is cleared in unquiesce? then the callers can just continue
> > > to iterate but will only wait the rcu grace period once.
> > 
> > Yeah, that is what these patches try to implement.
> 
> I was suggesting to "hide" it in the interface.
> Maybe something like:
> --
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
> index 8799fa73ef34..627b631db1f9 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> @@ -263,14 +263,18 @@ void blk_mq_wait_quiesce_done(struct request_queue *q)
>         unsigned int i;
>         bool rcu = false;
> 
> +       if (!q->has_srcu && q->quiesced)
> +               return;
>         queue_for_each_hw_ctx(q, hctx, i) {
>                 if (hctx->flags & BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING)
>                         synchronize_srcu(hctx->srcu);
>                 else
>                         rcu = true;
>         }
> -       if (rcu)
> +       if (rcu) {
>                 synchronize_rcu();
> +               q->quiesced = true;
> +       }
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blk_mq_wait_quiesce_done);
> 
> @@ -308,6 +312,7 @@ void blk_mq_unquiesce_queue(struct request_queue *q)
>         } else if (!--q->quiesce_depth) {
>                 blk_queue_flag_clear(QUEUE_FLAG_QUIESCED, q);
>                 run_queue = true;
> +               q->quiesced = false;

Different request queues are passed to blk_mq_wait_quiesce_done() during
the iteration, so marking 'quiesced' doesn't make any difference here.


Thanks,
Ming



  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-30  2:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-19  2:18 [PATCH 0/5] blk-mq: quiesce improvement Ming Lei
2021-11-19  2:18 ` [PATCH 1/5] blk-mq: move srcu from blk_mq_hw_ctx to request_queue Ming Lei
2021-11-19  4:30   ` Bart Van Assche
2021-11-19  8:10     ` Ming Lei
2021-11-22  7:48       ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-11-22 13:08         ` Ming Lei
2021-11-22 13:47           ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-11-19  2:18 ` [PATCH 2/5] blk-mq: rename hctx_lock & hctx_unlock Ming Lei
2021-11-22  7:53   ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-11-22 13:20     ` Ming Lei
2021-11-22 13:50       ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-11-23  0:08         ` Ming Lei
2021-11-23  8:54           ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-11-22  9:00   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-19  2:18 ` [PATCH 3/5] blk-mq: add helper of blk_mq_global_quiesce_wait() Ming Lei
2021-11-22  7:56   ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-11-22  8:00     ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-11-22 13:26     ` Ming Lei
2021-11-22 13:55       ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-11-23  0:17         ` Ming Lei
2021-11-23  9:00           ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-11-30  2:33             ` Ming Lei [this message]
2021-12-08 12:49               ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-12-10  2:02                 ` Ming Lei
2021-11-19  2:18 ` [PATCH 4/5] nvme: quiesce namespace queue in parallel Ming Lei
2021-11-22  8:07   ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-11-23  0:13     ` Ming Lei
2021-11-19  2:18 ` [PATCH 5/5] scsi: use blk-mq quiesce APIs to implement scsi_host_block Ming Lei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YaWNZF3ZYWPQBSbk@T590 \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox