From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80B92C433EF for ; Mon, 16 May 2022 16:21:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=kFGWb1We5U0CckrfixpOdyJGd1qe6B/djFaqHk+eUK0=; b=amPnyjzLYojGK9eMJznSfz6FnO CJVu09OI/luIJjlLWqnfRpyCTDXVKW/Kgp+X2SXQ7llERIrOA3zovFrEFIUGneFK8pbu1qOGRSPVZ WpDwxPcOkTE42vKuAbqbpVFWjRLHJwB1r2kz5TlMWZmPpbPMmKb+8vjfATViI0GxxCKIGQxnEInFx 4SDImq6ncgfTugY0bmTaHil/+8YjPJJWY5DOpbbkg4Xp2yXySRLjoPxk1tLBXcpYfBJYjy7yse+jh rLoGidLS0wHPnJGeG7FbnIUShab1Ukk/BxlD3Wb5cHiH07INLNH3k9N5zUWRixYhr1qihipDJTBxZ vjLAkJhg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nqdT7-008wIt-53; Mon, 16 May 2022 16:21:13 +0000 Received: from sin.source.kernel.org ([145.40.73.55]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nqdT4-008wIH-Mi for linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 16 May 2022 16:21:12 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sin.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69EACCE16E4; Mon, 16 May 2022 16:21:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2535DC385AA; Mon, 16 May 2022 16:21:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1652718066; bh=lvXF8B5cEFUP14fnSDwDUKarvgqBYRZjzjXhSBwkuQQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=FVk9TyGoySpfn0rv8yBCMn0zFvFpa7dWiSvgK7cYI5kZypMH3c+shdZoz7BwkaI7X lc8LQ3exuP6PGNHEAdsYUe91tkaRuPmxfTYzi6SOX+2+yN46HrKC4YhHqeuKpb+KkK GZGfL0dEZ5Vig0TLYdVcg0M2xWSltg33/YnZkubIGFwMMx21XZ5gyrPP0JSTc7V0bt cKxth8/E0z5FbB2H012Oq2wv7Qe+XneJyVdfXA1qN6Kk2MMkPe8MqyIdzqiQZVHag4 j4I8rvVrNHFamFTq8ugxaQp8ERlA7fQ/nM6/AkQNgGFY3N+qYPLzliMuY3nbqg1off ExVv2+sau19Og== Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 10:21:03 -0600 From: Keith Busch To: Daniel Wagner Cc: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, Ming Lei , Sagi Grimberg , Hannes Reinecke , Martin Wilck , Belanger Martin , James Smart , Hanumanthu H Subject: Re: nvme-cli license clarification Message-ID: References: <20220516161608.of4tklsysuvgbtie@carbon.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220516161608.of4tklsysuvgbtie@carbon.lan> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220516_092110_959857_1D57B9A5 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.37 ) X-BeenThere: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "Linux-nvme" Errors-To: linux-nvme-bounces+linux-nvme=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 06:16:08PM +0200, Daniel Wagner wrote: > 2. nvme.h > > The situation here is a bit simpler as Keith is 'owning' most > of the lines (monolithic and master branch are almost identically) > > Copyright (c) 2011-2014, Intel Corporation > > 104 Keith Busch > 26 Hannes Reinecke > 6 Steven Seungcheol Lee > 3 Sagi Grimberg > 3 Christoph Hellwig > 2 Scott Bauer > 2 Minwoo Im > 2 Martin Wilck > 2 Daniel Wagner > 1 Warner Losh > 1 Tomasz Zawadzki > 1 Ming Lin > 1 Max Gurtovoy > 1 Martin Belanger > 1 Jeffrey Lien > 1 James Smart > 1 Brandon Paupore > > I suppose someone from Intel needs to signed of the 'or any later > version' thing. Keith do you happen to have a contact for this? I am not sure of who would be interested at Intel in this anymore. This was initially just a copy of the Linux kernel's header, though, and diverged significantly from there, but I guess we'd need to inherit the original's GPLv2 only license?