From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
Cc: Yi Zhang <yi.zhang@redhat.com>,
"open list:NVM EXPRESS DRIVER" <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-block <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Subject: Re: [bug report] nvme/rdma: nvme connect failed after offline one cpu on host side
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2022 08:49:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YsOKnb7MWLCeJxBE@T590> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2c42c70a-8eb4-a095-1d2b-139614ebd903@grimberg.me>
On Tue, Jul 05, 2022 at 02:04:53AM +0300, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
>
> > update the subject to better describe the issue:
> >
> > So I tried this issue on one nvme/rdma environment, and it was also
> > reproducible, here are the steps:
> >
> > # echo 0 >/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/online
> > # dmesg | tail -10
> > [ 781.577235] smpboot: CPU 0 is now offline
> > # nvme connect -t rdma -a 172.31.45.202 -s 4420 -n testnqn
> > Failed to write to /dev/nvme-fabrics: Invalid cross-device link
> > no controller found: failed to write to nvme-fabrics device
> >
> > # dmesg
> > [ 781.577235] smpboot: CPU 0 is now offline
> > [ 799.471627] nvme nvme0: creating 39 I/O queues.
> > [ 801.053782] nvme nvme0: mapped 39/0/0 default/read/poll queues.
> > [ 801.064149] nvme nvme0: Connect command failed, error wo/DNR bit: -16402
> > [ 801.073059] nvme nvme0: failed to connect queue: 1 ret=-18
>
> This is because of blk_mq_alloc_request_hctx() and was raised before.
>
> IIRC there was reluctance to make it allocate a request for an hctx even
> if its associated mapped cpu is offline.
>
> The latest attempt was from Ming:
> [PATCH V7 0/3] blk-mq: fix blk_mq_alloc_request_hctx
>
> Don't know where that went tho...
The attempt relies on that the queue for connecting io queue uses
non-admined irq, unfortunately that can't be true for all drivers,
so that way can't go.
So far, I'd suggest to fix nvme_*_connect_io_queues() to ignore failed
io queue, then the nvme host still can be setup with less io queues.
Otherwise nvme_*_connect_io_queues() could fail easily, especially for
1:1 mapping.
Thanks,
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-05 0:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-30 6:02 [bug report] blktests nvme/004 failed after offline cpu Yi Zhang
2022-07-04 5:42 ` [bug report] nvme/rdma: nvme connect failed after offline one cpu on host side Yi Zhang
2022-07-04 23:04 ` Sagi Grimberg
2022-07-05 0:49 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2022-07-06 15:30 ` Sagi Grimberg
2022-07-07 1:46 ` Ming Lei
2022-07-07 7:28 ` Sagi Grimberg
2022-07-07 8:07 ` Ming Lei
2022-07-26 2:05 ` Ming Lei
2022-07-26 8:56 ` Sagi Grimberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YsOKnb7MWLCeJxBE@T590 \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=yi.zhang@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox