public inbox for linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
	Yi Zhang <yi.zhang@redhat.com>,
	ming.lei@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme-pci: fix race between pci reset and nvme probe
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2022 20:34:38 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yu0OXgQo/HdusMEu@T590> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YuxAQmHrwLGL4Wap@kbusch-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com>

On Thu, Aug 04, 2022 at 03:55:14PM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2022 at 08:57:53PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > After nvme_probe() returns, device lock is released, and PCI reset
> > handler may come, meantime reset work is just scheduled and should
> > be in-progress.
> > 
> > When nvme_reset_prepare() is run, all NSs may not be allocated yet
> > and each NS's request queue won't be frozen by nvme_dev_disable().
> > 
> > But when nvme_reset_done() is called for resetting controller, all
> > NSs may have been scanned successfully, and nvme_wait_freeze() is
> > called on un-frozen request queues, then wait forever.
> > 
> > Fix the issue by holding device lock for resetting from nvme probe.
> 
> Beyond the issues with locking the pci device, I think the problem you're
> describing is generic to any rescan that alters the namespace inventory, so we
> can't resolve it only on probe.

Yeah, just it is easier to trigger during the 1st scan when no any NS
exits.

> 
> Is it enough to track the frozen status within the namespace flags? Something
> like the following:

I guess the patch could avoid the issue.

Another way might be to remove nvme_wait_freeze() from nvme_reset_work(). No
see it is necessary:

- nvme_dev_add():

if (!dev->ctrl.tagset) {
	...
} else {
	blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues(&dev->tagset, dev->online_queues - 1);
	...
} 

If there isn't tagset, there can't be IO; and if nr_hw_queues is to be
changed really, blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues() will freeze queue, otherwise
it isn't necessary to nvme_wait_freeze() before calling
blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues.



Thanks,
Ming



      reply	other threads:[~2022-08-05 12:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-01 12:57 [PATCH] nvme-pci: fix race between pci reset and nvme probe Ming Lei
2022-08-01 14:33 ` Keith Busch
2022-08-02  0:05   ` Ming Lei
2022-08-02  2:22     ` Keith Busch
2022-08-04 21:55 ` Keith Busch
2022-08-05 12:34   ` Ming Lei [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Yu0OXgQo/HdusMEu@T590 \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    --cc=yi.zhang@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox