public inbox for linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Chao Leng <lengchao@huawei.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, Yi Zhang <yi.zhang@redhat.com>,
	Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] nvme: make NVMe freeze API reliably
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2022 16:45:05 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YxcIkV2slhTR9MHX@T590> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e2568bdd-a3cb-7a94-8018-d1468f3dcdd4@huawei.com>

On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 06:02:33PM +0800, Chao Leng wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2022/8/21 16:47, Ming Lei wrote:
> > From: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
> > 
> > In some corner cases[1], freeze wait and unfreeze API may be called on
> > unfrozen queue, add one per-ns flag of NVME_NS_FREEZE to make these
> > freeze APIs more reliably, then this kind of issues can be avoided.
> > And similar approach has been applied on stopping/quiescing nvme queues.
> This leads to another problem: the process that needs to be
> in the frozen state is not actually frozen.
> It's not safe.

The flag is just to control if queue wait is needed, blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait
can be done only the flag is set. Not sure how it isn't safe.

Meantime calling blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait() on queue not being started
to freeze is usually a bug, and I think WARN_ON_ONCE() can be added
in nvme_wait_freeze().


Thanks,
Ming



  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-09-06  8:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-21  8:47 [PATCH 0/2] nvme: make NVMe freeze API reliably Ming Lei
2022-08-21  8:47 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Ming Lei
2022-08-24 11:15   ` Hannes Reinecke
2022-08-24 14:07     ` Keith Busch
2022-08-25 10:02   ` Chao Leng
2022-09-06  4:49     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-09-06  8:45     ` Ming Lei [this message]
2022-09-06  9:32       ` Chao Leng
2022-09-07  0:33         ` Ming Lei
2022-09-07  1:18           ` Chao Leng
2022-09-07  2:06             ` Ming Lei
2022-09-07  5:58               ` Chao Leng
2022-08-28 14:37   ` Sagi Grimberg
2022-08-21  8:47 ` [PATCH 2/2] nvme-pci: don't wait freeze during resetting Ming Lei
2022-08-25 10:05   ` Chao Leng
2022-08-25 11:34     ` Ming Lei
2022-08-25 13:42       ` Keith Busch
2022-08-25 14:15         ` Ming Lei
2022-08-26  1:27           ` Chao Leng
2022-08-28 14:37   ` Sagi Grimberg
2022-09-06  4:49   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-08-24 11:57 ` [PATCH 0/2] nvme: make NVMe freeze API reliably Yi Zhang
2022-09-19 14:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-09-20  0:51   ` Ming Lei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YxcIkV2slhTR9MHX@T590 \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=lengchao@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    --cc=yi.zhang@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox