From: Chris Leech <cleech@redhat.com>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@kernel.org>
Cc: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] nvme-tcp: sanitize request list handling
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 11:53:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z9CGtUqkAR6uWWs-@my-developer-toolbox-latest> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250307132802.111513-3-hare@kernel.org>
On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 02:28:01PM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> Validate the request in nvme_tcp_handle_r2t() to ensure it's not
> part of any list, otherwise a malicious R2T PDU might inject a
> loop in request list processing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@kernel.org>
> ---
> drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c | 11 ++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
...
> @@ -759,8 +762,12 @@ static int nvme_tcp_handle_r2t(struct nvme_tcp_queue *queue,
>
> nvme_tcp_setup_h2c_data_pdu(req);
>
> + WARN_ON(queue->request == req);
> + WARN_ON(llist_on_list(&req->lentry));
> + WARN_ON(!list_empty(&req->entry));
> llist_add(&req->lentry, &queue->req_list);
Are we happy with a WARN here, or should this be handled as an error?
The idea of an duplicate R2Ts creating a loop in req_list is
frightening.
- Chris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-11 18:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-07 13:27 [PATCH 0/3] nvme-tcp: fixup I/O stall on congested sockets Hannes Reinecke
2025-03-07 13:28 ` [PATCH 1/3] nvme-tcp: avoid inline sending when handling R2T PDUs Hannes Reinecke
2025-03-11 18:40 ` Chris Leech
2025-03-12 8:14 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-03-07 13:28 ` [PATCH 2/3] nvme-tcp: sanitize request list handling Hannes Reinecke
2025-03-11 18:53 ` Chris Leech [this message]
2025-03-12 8:16 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-03-12 12:27 ` Maurizio Lombardi
2025-03-07 13:28 ` [PATCH 3/3] nvme-tcp: fix I/O stalls on congested sockets Hannes Reinecke
2025-03-11 18:55 ` Chris Leech
2025-03-10 17:02 ` [PATCH 0/3] nvme-tcp: fixup I/O stall " Keith Busch
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-04-03 6:55 [PATCHv3 " Hannes Reinecke
2025-04-03 6:55 ` [PATCH 2/3] nvme-tcp: sanitize request list handling Hannes Reinecke
2025-04-13 23:00 ` Sagi Grimberg
2025-04-14 12:35 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-04-14 20:29 ` Sagi Grimberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z9CGtUqkAR6uWWs-@my-developer-toolbox-latest \
--to=cleech@redhat.com \
--cc=hare@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox