nvme discard limits fix and tidy ups

nvme discard limits fix and tidy ups

[Christoph Hellwig]

Hi all,

this series contains a fix that makes sure that the discard limits
are properly calculated based on the LBA size for each namespaces,
and also tidies up some code around that.

Diffstat:
 core.c |   41 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
 nvme.h |    3 +--
 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

[PATCH 1/4] nvme: update the explanation for not updating the limits in nvme_config_discard

[Christoph Hellwig]

Expeand the comment a bit to explain what is going on.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
 drivers/nvme/host/core.c | 8 +++++++-
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
index d144d1acb09a05..56107cfc97b7bc 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
@@ -1743,7 +1743,13 @@ static void nvme_config_discard(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl, struct gendisk *disk,
 
 	queue->limits.discard_granularity = size;
 
-	/* If discard is already enabled, don't reset queue limits */
+	/*
+	 * If discard is already enabled, don't reset queue limits.
+	 *
+	 * This works around the fact that the block layer can't cope well with
+	 * updating the hardware limits when overridden through sysfs.  This is
+	 * harmless because discard limits in NVMe are purely advisory.
+	 */
 	if (queue->limits.max_discard_sectors)
 		return;
 
-- 
2.39.2

[PATCH 2/4] nvme: also skip discard granularity updates in nvme_config_discard

[Christoph Hellwig]

Don't just skip the discard sectors and segments but also the granularity
if a value was already set before.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
 drivers/nvme/host/core.c | 4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
index 56107cfc97b7bc..6c52b0ab382c85 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
@@ -1727,7 +1727,6 @@ static void nvme_config_discard(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl, struct gendisk *disk,
 		struct nvme_ns_head *head)
 {
 	struct request_queue *queue = disk->queue;
-	u32 size = queue_logical_block_size(queue);
 
 	if (ctrl->dmrsl && ctrl->dmrsl <= nvme_sect_to_lba(head, UINT_MAX))
 		ctrl->max_discard_sectors =
@@ -1741,8 +1740,6 @@ static void nvme_config_discard(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl, struct gendisk *disk,
 	BUILD_BUG_ON(PAGE_SIZE / sizeof(struct nvme_dsm_range) <
 			NVME_DSM_MAX_RANGES);
 
-	queue->limits.discard_granularity = size;
-
 	/*
 	 * If discard is already enabled, don't reset queue limits.
 	 *
@@ -1755,6 +1752,7 @@ static void nvme_config_discard(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl, struct gendisk *disk,
 
 	blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(queue, ctrl->max_discard_sectors);
 	blk_queue_max_discard_segments(queue, ctrl->max_discard_segments);
+	queue->limits.discard_granularity = queue_logical_block_size(queue);
 
 	if (ctrl->quirks & NVME_QUIRK_DEALLOCATE_ZEROES)
 		blk_queue_max_write_zeroes_sectors(queue, UINT_MAX);
-- 
2.39.2

Re: [PATCH 2/4] nvme: also skip discard granularity updates in nvme_config_discard

[Max Gurtovoy]

On 26/12/2023 10:58, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Don't just skip the discard sectors and segments but also the granularity
> if a value was already set before.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
>   drivers/nvme/host/core.c | 4 +---
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> index 56107cfc97b7bc..6c52b0ab382c85 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> @@ -1727,7 +1727,6 @@ static void nvme_config_discard(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl, struct gendisk *disk,
>   		struct nvme_ns_head *head)
>   {
>   	struct request_queue *queue = disk->queue;
> -	u32 size = queue_logical_block_size(queue);
>   
>   	if (ctrl->dmrsl && ctrl->dmrsl <= nvme_sect_to_lba(head, UINT_MAX))
>   		ctrl->max_discard_sectors =
> @@ -1741,8 +1740,6 @@ static void nvme_config_discard(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl, struct gendisk *disk,
>   	BUILD_BUG_ON(PAGE_SIZE / sizeof(struct nvme_dsm_range) <
>   			NVME_DSM_MAX_RANGES);
>   
> -	queue->limits.discard_granularity = size;
> -
>   	/*
>   	 * If discard is already enabled, don't reset queue limits.
>   	 *
> @@ -1755,6 +1752,7 @@ static void nvme_config_discard(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl, struct gendisk *disk,
>   
>   	blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(queue, ctrl->max_discard_sectors);
>   	blk_queue_max_discard_segments(queue, ctrl->max_discard_segments);
> +	queue->limits.discard_granularity = queue_logical_block_size(queue);
>   
>   	if (ctrl->quirks & NVME_QUIRK_DEALLOCATE_ZEROES)
>   		blk_queue_max_write_zeroes_sectors(queue, UINT_MAX);

maybe worth to add a small helper like we have for other discard limits:

diff --git a/block/blk-settings.c b/block/blk-settings.c
index 0046b447268f..b7eee29ca8ec 100644
--- a/block/blk-settings.c
+++ b/block/blk-settings.c
@@ -369,6 +369,17 @@ void blk_queue_zone_write_granularity(struct 
request_queue *q,
  }
  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blk_queue_zone_write_granularity);

+/**
+ * blk_queue_discard_granularity - set discard granularity for the queue
+ * @q:  the request queue for the device
+ * @size:  the discard granularity size, in bytes
+ */
+void blk_queue_discard_granularity(struct request_queue *q, unsigned 
int size)
+{
+       q->limits.discard_granularity = size;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blk_queue_discard_granularity);
+
  /**
   * blk_queue_alignment_offset - set physical block alignment offset
   * @q: the request queue for the device


otherwise looks good,
Reviewed-by: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com>

Re: [PATCH 2/4] nvme: also skip discard granularity updates in nvme_config_discard

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Wed, Dec 27, 2023 at 01:18:13AM +0200, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
> maybe worth to add a small helper like we have for other discard limits:

I'd rather not add more wrappers like this.  They dont really
scale, so I'm looking into atomic bulk updates of all settings right
now, and the last I need is random churn due to a new helper..

[PATCH 3/4] nvme: fix max_discard_sectors calculation

[Christoph Hellwig]

ctrl->max_discard_sectors stores a value that is potentially based of
the DMRSL field in Identify Controller, which is in units of LBAs and
thus dependent on the Format of a namespace.

Fix this by moving the calculation of max_discard_sectors entirely
into nvme_config_discard and replacing the ctrl->max_discard_sectors
value with a local variable so that the calculation is always
namespace-specific.

Fixes: 1a86924e4f46 ("nvme: fix interpretation of DMRSL")
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
 drivers/nvme/host/core.c | 20 +++++++++-----------
 drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h |  1 -
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
index 6c52b0ab382c85..86b9a1c4876f5f 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
@@ -1727,12 +1727,13 @@ static void nvme_config_discard(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl, struct gendisk *disk,
 		struct nvme_ns_head *head)
 {
 	struct request_queue *queue = disk->queue;
+	u32 max_discard_sectors;
 
-	if (ctrl->dmrsl && ctrl->dmrsl <= nvme_sect_to_lba(head, UINT_MAX))
-		ctrl->max_discard_sectors =
-			nvme_lba_to_sect(head, ctrl->dmrsl);
-
-	if (ctrl->max_discard_sectors == 0) {
+	if (ctrl->dmrsl && ctrl->dmrsl <= nvme_sect_to_lba(head, UINT_MAX)) {
+		max_discard_sectors = nvme_lba_to_sect(head, ctrl->dmrsl);
+	} else if (ctrl->oncs & NVME_CTRL_ONCS_DSM) {
+		max_discard_sectors = UINT_MAX;
+	} else {
 		blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(queue, 0);
 		return;
 	}
@@ -1750,7 +1751,7 @@ static void nvme_config_discard(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl, struct gendisk *disk,
 	if (queue->limits.max_discard_sectors)
 		return;
 
-	blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(queue, ctrl->max_discard_sectors);
+	blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(queue, max_discard_sectors);
 	blk_queue_max_discard_segments(queue, ctrl->max_discard_segments);
 	queue->limits.discard_granularity = queue_logical_block_size(queue);
 
@@ -2911,13 +2912,10 @@ static int nvme_init_non_mdts_limits(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl)
 	struct nvme_id_ctrl_nvm *id;
 	int ret;
 
-	if (ctrl->oncs & NVME_CTRL_ONCS_DSM) {
-		ctrl->max_discard_sectors = UINT_MAX;
+	if (ctrl->oncs & NVME_CTRL_ONCS_DSM)
 		ctrl->max_discard_segments = NVME_DSM_MAX_RANGES;
-	} else {
-		ctrl->max_discard_sectors = 0;
+	else
 		ctrl->max_discard_segments = 0;
-	}
 
 	/*
 	 * Even though NVMe spec explicitly states that MDTS is not applicable
diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h b/drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h
index 3dbd187896d8d8..9a698c49ea0364 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h
@@ -297,7 +297,6 @@ struct nvme_ctrl {
 	u32 max_hw_sectors;
 	u32 max_segments;
 	u32 max_integrity_segments;
-	u32 max_discard_sectors;
 	u32 max_discard_segments;
 	u32 max_zeroes_sectors;
 #ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ZONED
-- 
2.39.2

Re: [PATCH 3/4] nvme: fix max_discard_sectors calculation

[Keith Busch]

On Tue, Dec 26, 2023 at 08:58:43AM +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> ctrl->max_discard_sectors stores a value that is potentially based of
> the DMRSL field in Identify Controller, which is in units of LBAs and
> thus dependent on the Format of a namespace.

Is it just me, or is this one of the more annoying conventions in NVMe
standard: controller scoped identification fields are in units of
namespace specific formats?! Why not define these in namespace
identifications, or provide a fixed unit size? As it is now, these types
of fields would be in units of the largest LBA size of any attached
namespace, and that's kind of awkward in a multi-namespace environment.
 
> @@ -1750,7 +1751,7 @@ static void nvme_config_discard(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl, struct gendisk *disk,
>  	if (queue->limits.max_discard_sectors)
>  		return;

Since DMRSL can change when you format a namespace to a new LBA size,
might the old limit be using the wrong max_discard_size if we skip
updating it here? Probably not a big deal.

And let's say the user explicitly disabled max_discard_sectors through
sysfs. The next driver namespace rescan will turn it back on, probably
against the user's expectations. Should this limit check use
'max_hw_discard_sectors' instead?

Anyway, the driver was like that already, and the series looks good to
me. I just noticed this weirdness while reviewing.

> -	blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(queue, ctrl->max_discard_sectors);
> +	blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(queue, max_discard_sectors);
>  	blk_queue_max_discard_segments(queue, ctrl->max_discard_segments);
>  	queue->limits.discard_granularity = queue_logical_block_size(queue);

[PATCH 4/4] nvme: simplify the max_discard_segments calculation

[Christoph Hellwig]

Just stash away the DMRL value in the nvme_ctrl struture, and leave
all interpretation to nvme_config_discard, where we know DSM is
supported by the time we're configuring the number of segments.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
 drivers/nvme/host/core.c | 13 +++++--------
 drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h |  2 +-
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
index 86b9a1c4876f5f..50818dbcfa1ae1 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
@@ -1752,7 +1752,10 @@ static void nvme_config_discard(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl, struct gendisk *disk,
 		return;
 
 	blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(queue, max_discard_sectors);
-	blk_queue_max_discard_segments(queue, ctrl->max_discard_segments);
+	if (ctrl->dmrl)
+		blk_queue_max_discard_segments(queue, ctrl->dmrl);
+	else
+		blk_queue_max_discard_segments(queue, NVME_DSM_MAX_RANGES);
 	queue->limits.discard_granularity = queue_logical_block_size(queue);
 
 	if (ctrl->quirks & NVME_QUIRK_DEALLOCATE_ZEROES)
@@ -2912,11 +2915,6 @@ static int nvme_init_non_mdts_limits(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl)
 	struct nvme_id_ctrl_nvm *id;
 	int ret;
 
-	if (ctrl->oncs & NVME_CTRL_ONCS_DSM)
-		ctrl->max_discard_segments = NVME_DSM_MAX_RANGES;
-	else
-		ctrl->max_discard_segments = 0;
-
 	/*
 	 * Even though NVMe spec explicitly states that MDTS is not applicable
 	 * to the write-zeroes, we are cautious and limit the size to the
@@ -2946,8 +2944,7 @@ static int nvme_init_non_mdts_limits(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl)
 	if (ret)
 		goto free_data;
 
-	if (id->dmrl)
-		ctrl->max_discard_segments = id->dmrl;
+	ctrl->dmrl = id->dmrl;
 	ctrl->dmrsl = le32_to_cpu(id->dmrsl);
 	if (id->wzsl)
 		ctrl->max_zeroes_sectors = nvme_mps_to_sectors(ctrl, id->wzsl);
diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h b/drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h
index 9a698c49ea0364..297b80430f1b69 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h
@@ -297,13 +297,13 @@ struct nvme_ctrl {
 	u32 max_hw_sectors;
 	u32 max_segments;
 	u32 max_integrity_segments;
-	u32 max_discard_segments;
 	u32 max_zeroes_sectors;
 #ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ZONED
 	u32 max_zone_append;
 #endif
 	u16 crdt[3];
 	u16 oncs;
+	u8 dmrl;
 	u32 dmrsl;
 	u16 oacs;
 	u16 sqsize;
-- 
2.39.2

Re: nvme discard limits fix and tidy ups

[Keith Busch]

On Tue, Dec 26, 2023 at 08:58:40AM +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> this series contains a fix that makes sure that the discard limits
> are properly calculated based on the LBA size for each namespaces,
> and also tidies up some code around that.

Applied to nvme-6.8.

fix discard limits

[Christoph Hellwig]

Hi all,

this series fixes a few issues related to max_discard_sector limits
in the block layer and nvme.

Subject:
 block/blk-settings.c     |    4 +++-
 drivers/nvme/host/core.c |   35 +++++++++++++----------------------
 drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h |    3 +--
 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

[PATCH 3/4] nvme: fix max_discard_sectors calculation

[Christoph Hellwig]

ctrl->max_discard_sectors stores a value that is potentially based of
the DMRSL field in Identify Controller, which is in units of LBAs and
thus dependent on the Format of a namespace.

Fix this by moving the calculation of max_discard_sectors entirely
into nvme_config_discard and replacing the ctrl->max_discard_sectors
value with a local variable so that the calculation is always
namespace-specific.

Fixes: 1a86924e4f46 ("nvme: fix interpretation of DMRSL")
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
 drivers/nvme/host/core.c | 22 ++++++++++------------
 drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h |  1 -
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
index 2d6c1f4ad7f5c8..05372bec3b7aff 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
@@ -1721,20 +1721,21 @@ static void nvme_config_discard(struct gendisk *disk, struct nvme_ns *ns)
 	struct request_queue *queue = disk->queue;
 	u32 size = queue_logical_block_size(queue);
 
-	if (ctrl->dmrsl && ctrl->dmrsl <= nvme_sect_to_lba(ns, UINT_MAX))
-		ctrl->max_discard_sectors = nvme_lba_to_sect(ns, ctrl->dmrsl);
+	BUILD_BUG_ON(PAGE_SIZE / sizeof(struct nvme_dsm_range) <
+			NVME_DSM_MAX_RANGES);
 
-	if (ctrl->max_discard_sectors == 0) {
+	if (ctrl->dmrsl && ctrl->dmrsl <= nvme_sect_to_lba(ns, UINT_MAX)) {
+		blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(queue,
+				nvme_lba_to_sect(ns, ctrl->dmrsl));
+	} else if (ctrl->oncs & NVME_CTRL_ONCS_DSM) {
+		blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(queue, UINT_MAX);
+	} else {
 		blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(queue, 0);
 		return;
 	}
 
-	BUILD_BUG_ON(PAGE_SIZE / sizeof(struct nvme_dsm_range) <
-			NVME_DSM_MAX_RANGES);
-
 	queue->limits.discard_granularity = size;
 
-	blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(queue, ctrl->max_discard_sectors);
 	blk_queue_max_discard_segments(queue, ctrl->max_discard_segments);
 
 	if (ctrl->quirks & NVME_QUIRK_DEALLOCATE_ZEROES)
@@ -2870,13 +2871,10 @@ static int nvme_init_non_mdts_limits(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl)
 	struct nvme_id_ctrl_nvm *id;
 	int ret;
 
-	if (ctrl->oncs & NVME_CTRL_ONCS_DSM) {
-		ctrl->max_discard_sectors = UINT_MAX;
+	if (ctrl->oncs & NVME_CTRL_ONCS_DSM)
 		ctrl->max_discard_segments = NVME_DSM_MAX_RANGES;
-	} else {
-		ctrl->max_discard_sectors = 0;
+	else
 		ctrl->max_discard_segments = 0;
-	}
 
 	/*
 	 * Even though NVMe spec explicitly states that MDTS is not applicable
diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h b/drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h
index f35647c470afad..d59ed2ba1c37ca 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h
@@ -296,7 +296,6 @@ struct nvme_ctrl {
 	u32 max_hw_sectors;
 	u32 max_segments;
 	u32 max_integrity_segments;
-	u32 max_discard_sectors;
 	u32 max_discard_segments;
 	u32 max_zeroes_sectors;
 #ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ZONED
-- 
2.39.2

Re: [PATCH 3/4] nvme: fix max_discard_sectors calculation

[Damien Le Moal]

On 7/7/23 18:46, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> ctrl->max_discard_sectors stores a value that is potentially based of
> the DMRSL field in Identify Controller, which is in units of LBAs and
> thus dependent on the Format of a namespace.
> 
> Fix this by moving the calculation of max_discard_sectors entirely
> into nvme_config_discard and replacing the ctrl->max_discard_sectors
> value with a local variable so that the calculation is always

I do not see a local variable replacement... May be you meant direct calls to
blk_queue_max_discard_sectors() ?

Other than that, looks OK to me.

Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>

> namespace-specific.
> 
> Fixes: 1a86924e4f46 ("nvme: fix interpretation of DMRSL")
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
>  drivers/nvme/host/core.c | 22 ++++++++++------------
>  drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h |  1 -
>  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> index 2d6c1f4ad7f5c8..05372bec3b7aff 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> @@ -1721,20 +1721,21 @@ static void nvme_config_discard(struct gendisk *disk, struct nvme_ns *ns)
>  	struct request_queue *queue = disk->queue;
>  	u32 size = queue_logical_block_size(queue);
>  
> -	if (ctrl->dmrsl && ctrl->dmrsl <= nvme_sect_to_lba(ns, UINT_MAX))
> -		ctrl->max_discard_sectors = nvme_lba_to_sect(ns, ctrl->dmrsl);
> +	BUILD_BUG_ON(PAGE_SIZE / sizeof(struct nvme_dsm_range) <
> +			NVME_DSM_MAX_RANGES);
>  
> -	if (ctrl->max_discard_sectors == 0) {
> +	if (ctrl->dmrsl && ctrl->dmrsl <= nvme_sect_to_lba(ns, UINT_MAX)) {
> +		blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(queue,
> +				nvme_lba_to_sect(ns, ctrl->dmrsl));
> +	} else if (ctrl->oncs & NVME_CTRL_ONCS_DSM) {
> +		blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(queue, UINT_MAX);
> +	} else {
>  		blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(queue, 0);
>  		return;
>  	}
>  
> -	BUILD_BUG_ON(PAGE_SIZE / sizeof(struct nvme_dsm_range) <
> -			NVME_DSM_MAX_RANGES);
> -
>  	queue->limits.discard_granularity = size;
>  
> -	blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(queue, ctrl->max_discard_sectors);
>  	blk_queue_max_discard_segments(queue, ctrl->max_discard_segments);
>  
>  	if (ctrl->quirks & NVME_QUIRK_DEALLOCATE_ZEROES)
> @@ -2870,13 +2871,10 @@ static int nvme_init_non_mdts_limits(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl)
>  	struct nvme_id_ctrl_nvm *id;
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	if (ctrl->oncs & NVME_CTRL_ONCS_DSM) {
> -		ctrl->max_discard_sectors = UINT_MAX;
> +	if (ctrl->oncs & NVME_CTRL_ONCS_DSM)
>  		ctrl->max_discard_segments = NVME_DSM_MAX_RANGES;
> -	} else {
> -		ctrl->max_discard_sectors = 0;
> +	else
>  		ctrl->max_discard_segments = 0;
> -	}
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Even though NVMe spec explicitly states that MDTS is not applicable
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h b/drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h
> index f35647c470afad..d59ed2ba1c37ca 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h
> @@ -296,7 +296,6 @@ struct nvme_ctrl {
>  	u32 max_hw_sectors;
>  	u32 max_segments;
>  	u32 max_integrity_segments;
> -	u32 max_discard_sectors;
>  	u32 max_discard_segments;
>  	u32 max_zeroes_sectors;
>  #ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ZONED

-- 
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research

Re: [PATCH 3/4] nvme: fix max_discard_sectors calculation

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 12:57:56PM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> On 7/7/23 18:46, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > ctrl->max_discard_sectors stores a value that is potentially based of
> > the DMRSL field in Identify Controller, which is in units of LBAs and
> > thus dependent on the Format of a namespace.
> > 
> > Fix this by moving the calculation of max_discard_sectors entirely
> > into nvme_config_discard and replacing the ctrl->max_discard_sectors
> > value with a local variable so that the calculation is always
> 
> I do not see a local variable replacement... May be you meant direct calls to
> blk_queue_max_discard_sectors() ?

Yeah, I used a local variable first, but then noticed they are
pointless as we can just call blk_queue_max_discard_sectors directly
and didn't update the commit log.

Re: [PATCH 3/4] nvme: fix max_discard_sectors calculation

[Sagi Grimberg]

Reviewed-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>