From: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
To: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] nvmet: pci-epf: Always fully initialize completion entries
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 09:24:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z_eAViyjhh1saaP7@kbusch-mbp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250408024733.690966-2-dlemoal@kernel.org>
On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 11:47:31AM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> For a command that is normally processed through the command request
> execute() function, the completion entry for the command is initialized
> by __nvmet_req_complete() and nvmet_pci_epf_cq_work() only needs to set
> the status field and the phase of the completion entry before posting
> the entry to the completion queue.
>
> However, for commands that are failed due to an internal error (e.g. the
> command data buffer allocation fails), the command request execute()
> function is not called and __nvmet_req_complete() is never executed for
> the command, leaving the command completion entry uninitialized. For
> such command failed before calling req->execute(), the host ends up
> seeing completion entries with an invalid submission queue ID and
> command ID.
>
> Avoid such issue by always fully initilizing a command completion entry
> in nvmet_pci_epf_cq_work(), setting the entry submission queue ID and
> command ID.
Looks good.
Reviewed-by: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-10 8:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-08 2:47 [PATCH 0/3] NVMe PCI endpoint target fixes Damien Le Moal
2025-04-08 2:47 ` [PATCH 1/3] nvmet: pci-epf: Always fully initialize completion entries Damien Le Moal
2025-04-10 8:24 ` Keith Busch [this message]
2025-04-10 8:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-10 9:15 ` Niklas Cassel
2025-04-14 22:03 ` Sagi Grimberg
2025-04-08 2:47 ` [PATCH 2/3] nvmet: pci-epf: Clear CC and CSTS when disabling the controller Damien Le Moal
2025-04-10 8:34 ` Keith Busch
2025-04-11 0:32 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-04-14 17:58 ` Keith Busch
2025-04-10 11:54 ` Niklas Cassel
2025-04-11 0:35 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-04-14 22:07 ` Sagi Grimberg
2025-04-08 2:47 ` [PATCH 3/3] nvmet: pci-epf: Cleanup link state management Damien Le Moal
2025-04-10 8:35 ` Keith Busch
2025-04-10 11:56 ` Niklas Cassel
2025-04-14 22:05 ` Sagi Grimberg
2025-04-10 8:05 ` [PATCH 0/3] NVMe PCI endpoint target fixes Damien Le Moal
2025-04-10 8:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z_eAViyjhh1saaP7@kbusch-mbp \
--to=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox