Re: [Lsf-pc] [LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] Removing GFP_NOFS

Johannes Thumshirn
2024-01-09T18:04:24Z

On 09.01.24 16:47, Luis Henriques wrote:
> Johannes Thumshirn <Johannes.Thumshirn@wdc.com> writes:
>>
>> As I've already feared we (as in btrfs) are the worst here.
>
> It probably won't make you feel any better, but the value for ceph isn't
> correct as you're just taking into account the code in 'fs/ceph/'. If you
> also take 'net/ceph/', it brings it much closer to btrfs: 63 + 48 = 111
>
> Cheers,

Yeah I've just quickly skimmed over fs/. There's net/ (69) and drivers/
(36) as well.