From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2B17C48BF8 for ; Thu, 22 Feb 2024 12:24:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=hWOITJu4r5lsySLBbsUAYu+To6wn7rng5eBjiQD5I8g=; b=kjL68pgY80pKlztX8WCaskp4vx fCYuQBT4MK1FyC0xqd1xzxMZt3XWc5SErtHmqIJ94WO7g1OInDPvhZz8FBXQ7qrY62yuxYkWTK/hw FfSPThxE0oCQ8MMDn5OSciq3wxAuP8QkdtdJ+BQDigIab/yNKfS0bAfi+iHEc9Ejq54INFg+HJpO2 5fFA+5KYB/3lWuFhxEM40RSxb1e7MRSwqr1IhXCWZdQ3dl/piyjjYDfeYTRzyC9w3Gw3nNlW7dj0B w8615dCqXn+hgtvWsr8DqjiQoPMZQGAvOmCkKfzjtlXwl49RN1TZ2xdj7mgqVM4iLIRnBn0hOLkYM VGyrmAYg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rd87T-00000004o2p-2r9f; Thu, 22 Feb 2024 12:24:07 +0000 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rd87O-00000004o1L-0uWu for linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 22 Feb 2024 12:24:03 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5138B617E7; Thu, 22 Feb 2024 12:24:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C2C60C433F1; Thu, 22 Feb 2024 12:24:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1708604641; bh=UQcJF0MxGv8FI6zkieEqniVVC2e2rV9dcda8hmiOZeU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=isDtrnurIw+5Awb+A0d791uKs9I8QT3zdq69bW1sofnwb5nAt8Kac80quAWL5f3RV P0+Jf36cR2xhYg4PTXu7SSFojqatfSknDlf+AF3Q29HmyfPVs1in/4OXO8zPTOKbfI QNBkantiKyCCvPLHlSF965Sk67dW7xv143FncXNIkPjzypclgtw24uIPs5j1XsjRbh Fm+NW7BsRao4R1z2VB7SftScm3I3iOmFrO9L08phdYEM8bPmwPwpIuZK6uX2EqVQXr nPyLhD8MF5u7g1FNwOvciDMhL6+0+crtpTgBQHvPfe5nZcPZunwlu6Z6E0z83gsZiy Uo0qWYln/uhuQ== Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 07:24:00 -0500 From: Sasha Levin To: Pavel Machek Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Wagner , Hannes Reinecke , Christoph Hellwig , Keith Busch , james.smart@broadcom.com, sagi@grimberg.me, kch@nvidia.com, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 13/16] nvmet-fc: do not tack refs on tgtports from assoc Message-ID: References: <20240207212700.4287-1-sashal@kernel.org> <20240207212700.4287-13-sashal@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240222_042402_367230_5AA8EB17 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 11.60 ) X-BeenThere: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "Linux-nvme" Errors-To: linux-nvme-bounces+linux-nvme=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 08:08:51PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: >Hi! > >> From: Daniel Wagner >> >> [ Upstream commit 1c110588dd95d21782397ff3cbaa55820b4e1fad ] >> >> The association life time is tied to the life time of the target port. >> That means we should not take extra a refcount when creating a >> association. > >I don't see this one queued for 6.1 or 6.6. What went wrong here? Yup, this should have been dropped from all trees. Thanks! -- Thanks, Sasha