From: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
To: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@suse.com>
Cc: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>, Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de>,
Stuart Hayes <stuart.w.hayes@gmail.com>,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme: core: freeze multipath queue early in nvme_update_ns_info()
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 15:38:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZsiQ4yCji0PexMQ-@ryzen.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240822201413.112268-1-mwilck@suse.com>
On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 10:14:13PM +0200, Martin Wilck wrote:
> For multipath devices, nvme_update_ns_info() needs to freeze both
> the queue of the path and the queue of the multipath device. For
> both operations, it waits for one RCU grace period to pass, ~25ms
> on my test system. By calling blk_freeze_queue_start() for the
> multipath queue early, we avoid waiting twice; tests using ftrace
> have shown that the second blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait() call finishes
> in just a few microseconds. The path queue is unfrozen before
> calling blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait() on the multipath queue, so that
> possibly outstanding IO in the multipath queue can be flushed.
>
> I tested this using the "controller rescan under I/O load" test
> I submitted recently [1].
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nvme/20240822193814.106111-3-mwilck@suse.com/T/#u
>
> Signed-off-by: Martin Wilck <mwilck@suse.com>
> ---
> drivers/nvme/host/core.c | 8 ++++++--
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> index 33fa01c599ad..e2454398c660 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> @@ -2217,6 +2217,9 @@ static int nvme_update_ns_info(struct nvme_ns *ns, struct nvme_ns_info *info)
> bool unsupported = false;
> int ret;
>
> + if (nvme_ns_head_multipath(ns->head))
> + blk_freeze_queue_start(ns->head->disk->queue);
> +
From someone reading this code, it looks quite similar to
nvme_mpath_start_freeze().
Perhaps create a new helper, with proper kdoc, and possibly also add kdoc to
nvme_mpath_start_freeze(), so that a user can easily tell (from the kdoc)
when to use which function.
Kind regards,
Niklas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-23 13:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-22 20:14 [PATCH] nvme: core: freeze multipath queue early in nvme_update_ns_info() Martin Wilck
2024-08-23 6:45 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-08-23 7:00 ` Daniel Wagner
2024-08-23 13:38 ` Niklas Cassel [this message]
2024-08-23 15:26 ` Martin Wilck
2024-08-23 15:51 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-08-25 8:28 ` Sagi Grimberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZsiQ4yCji0PexMQ-@ryzen.lan \
--to=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dwagner@suse.de \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=martin.wilck@suse.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=stuart.w.hayes@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox