From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02AFBC3ABB0 for ; Mon, 5 May 2025 14:21:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=ZV1Z2VR14ylgUix5FI+lRqQxmCZ8sNITwbPQ8g/6YZ4=; b=l4K1cKuV2Ucm/oMbxQKV+rqmT/ zUHeA/GlsfhIIwZMYvD+dxRA1CLuKehLnFeUWnjjJCX2UObt3QMc3e/8lqEIP9ZBzF7Zm3UMvdo4n jEqG3zQv6XIlYrj80jzORKwGGBToVucijv71Wvu+X7S0pUxOfNIKDr2Q6kTqKnXL2RB+8VPrKJFLQ 4hEZq48vOLNUUVmAAfdyIFYMleQb2hKDznn9Of9Tghw68iKnB6qqOkNbaI5q2sXSnL7ydinR7e9EN YY63U2MhaQh+CKd+u5q/cdfJ9Sa8GEYovAZfz46kLQXtWdNx+Kn2q6CrobKQkiaXMH1VtWzihcrf1 kghQa0qw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uBwhE-00000007c6w-0qgi; Mon, 05 May 2025 14:21:28 +0000 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([139.178.84.217]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uBwh8-00000007c4n-36kz for linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 05 May 2025 14:21:27 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D1C75C553D; Mon, 5 May 2025 14:19:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 72633C4CEEE; Mon, 5 May 2025 14:21:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1746454881; bh=ZV1Z2VR14ylgUix5FI+lRqQxmCZ8sNITwbPQ8g/6YZ4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=sySoIGMPnXUia5gYgjghar7ayTInJeYfRjo2/RniRA41GldkAI2ofuMu+WZG3CAXH JvXuPMjVSMmQnyW+6xyj88pSxOTAN7RDvRMCTVMguHzr+4Vck1CZCanTIpzkKniKHG et31GrPjuani2EXpEvdZY8+Y7L//LHseeLjMc+fUi1idbEC+rV2dta8ZfatCQ5Dwfu 7Dzk7m9RXC4GCBsklFVloFDarYOorTi6RLZy3Ld5mkUoa7Ept3bxn/h9nYDadJcsTH Fvkk1SAmCw+axLL2v+I/vUa206XXCA2FtvC2LanRYViRWuIo1PJ/0kIc09OzVGUXss j1TzuqzhjSpZA== Date: Mon, 5 May 2025 08:21:18 -0600 From: Keith Busch To: Caleb Sander Mateos Cc: Jens Axboe , Christoph Hellwig , Sagi Grimberg , Andrew Morton , Kanchan Joshi , linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/3] nvme/pci: PRP list DMA pool partitioning Message-ID: References: <20250426020636.34355-1-csander@purestorage.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250505_072122_820464_A4BC1DA5 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.25 ) X-BeenThere: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "Linux-nvme" Errors-To: linux-nvme-bounces+linux-nvme=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Fri, May 02, 2025 at 09:48:17AM -0700, Caleb Sander Mateos wrote: > It seems like there is consensus on this series and all patches have > multiple reviews. Would it be possible to queue it up for 6.16? The > NVMe tree seems like it would make sense, though maybe the dmapool > patch needs to go through the mm tree? The subsequent nvme patches depend on the dmapool patch, so they all need to go through the same tree. It's okay with me if nvme picks these up, but I think we need an Ack from one of the mm reviewers/maintainers.