From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59173C3ABC7 for ; Wed, 7 May 2025 03:46:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=yMIauxUIuW+HoqF685ItcdozcY2TEvm8DOxp+4JrKME=; b=hkUN0+5yoLQfds1QurtPZSVSN6 7YYrpnlfpQRJx+cbg3GBo894b+9grl4Mx2fv34xL1KUznwsFPbZDablIQSQP5vsW1Ouxj96rck66D FRp+B611K2enNlT9MfpgwZ6URenC8D+hDbx4XqO1Df2pglSgedKXUjRYxPQixyEkl/BvaFjnoKPLs gOavinT5NURv43E7dhBf1pXWlqejZ9g2v1buxdzU9ZNyOTAkqrQgNF7tr+cpaPrfmp6Ya5QOZwn1Z /tW7au5LFFTfPYyfmR8zgQ55k2dUfgSY2EiAnG0DoNrNYGls4gvREC6Eh0UsCgGlCHSthyRc1fFd5 5/qFJHpg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uCVju-0000000E754-2GkV; Wed, 07 May 2025 03:46:34 +0000 Received: from mail-pf1-x42c.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::42c]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uCQ73-0000000DT23-28Q2 for linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 06 May 2025 21:46:08 +0000 Received: by mail-pf1-x42c.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-72d3b48d2ffso6667812b3a.2 for ; Tue, 06 May 2025 14:46:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fromorbit-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1746567964; x=1747172764; darn=lists.infradead.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=yMIauxUIuW+HoqF685ItcdozcY2TEvm8DOxp+4JrKME=; b=Ra16hTFAxa0jln9hTeJYPfoecEARRazww9kmc5E+eF/ySxN5pUNOpaZXIWlbrikcA8 R74LMgl+Lr66tasQojqffwgq5y/7ATvbMXAwk0hvhyH/0kgWUtqQd94XCQm0MYbgfdAQ ojnAqf+sRjrwBdgSwyruEAVmubWfuXTA6NZUxIxA2J8VXXviT/eiWel8S9c0l7wfk7Tj ebE68ywjXS24ZMslYJDlMXcx5esXi/woB+QWRVUw7/PlV85w5uxKJyn4MCSXyA4px6MQ JzG+XlgrUtAKz5LXDxdESUxZX9EF6EiKz6EM97bYzNeXJA8DxbJXdkQOXSn2/GdEOzQi gKAA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1746567964; x=1747172764; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=yMIauxUIuW+HoqF685ItcdozcY2TEvm8DOxp+4JrKME=; b=wRK1tfzz6uojIH71ER7Uk8CX/iUjnEoXcATAd0Edz4uD9MA/cQSRtgNmkqxBE7+OlE n2VjoTJvfIg8NcP+R1aRkNjBfuuIXXH1SyejX6AY1wMIk/2/5uQlJXgZ2WWZEUs0WNpS puhLCu4+Eq/TXckq9wxcCsMqNWLvKehWdOtMWMonnRsCAPREk4jrv59JJUzlN0cTOYXw nmwVru4it7Ky0H+zD6k23yhyafM656CHe5+QbtZ2eciyYben7xpgzZCpQKCKR+Nr2u+F S8UGinYa91rhiTXn3xHcXbpgNsYpSgeOL9F/i676SinoWO40FyXGgJDDsKCmD3MtlzGw OxNg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVqos1KndHET+ULDiNBcevBOHrmo9tmUa3ssQZIPmfdDi2paWhICxwfxaChGHl4ZJAEA+kZvRuFyUM0@lists.infradead.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxwoXlQ70hkPP4Nh85g1kgH+SRvbZyx45kBo6OAmW9dQpmdvQ72 lkGvooDH/uqrIcevk+J6jZKQVMZ4WB75sIy47Sy73OowXYj6Rcn0brtrUKMeVOM= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnctpUX1uLf54+WxNc8kEJtwJ0ji/M939CBiUsFJbBUyQAixfeMqtsUfsz996KXn 6LpRhKd64bEpp4VeBmH6O9MiFywWzhXRg9cHXh112mVBUCkXmcEoOF6EaicV+pQwSxo14vgrdG1 hezErzUw96RKoyF0QcEhAiqNKFtBonejam9A6ZLefWDHJjux3jVib87O9MFTw/N7TFUlmLW+nVL 98F1dZi9FInWjAMASdEw2DU9ZtTDND7IVquLpAgZN94GXiAwda9rs1xCLTQD7m4Uq7OhxCjG1Wi nYlQys+g8r0N2EopUXcO4qKqch7BXrxhKaBciuzAiMbiSmHMcGNQpTKHDoplTHOc94YhXZymK1F puToQYdscbKbr6w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEDv1UiP/xCxZrA1w8m+KQBBlf4+RMLlDiU6bPNRxHPNwXX75ish2am3Kh1zQ+4fNgAJNLx6A== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a20:9e49:b0:203:becd:f98c with SMTP id adf61e73a8af0-2148bc12e8cmr1101048637.13.1746567964591; Tue, 06 May 2025 14:46:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dread.disaster.area (pa49-181-60-96.pa.nsw.optusnet.com.au. [49.181.60.96]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d2e1a72fcca58-740590a463fsm9917368b3a.173.2025.05.06.14.46.04 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 06 May 2025 14:46:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dave by dread.disaster.area with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1uCQ6z-00000000GTQ-0jbm; Wed, 07 May 2025 07:46:01 +1000 Date: Wed, 7 May 2025 07:46:01 +1000 From: Dave Chinner To: Anton Gavriliuk Cc: Laurence Oberman , linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Sequential read from NVMe/XFS twice slower on Fedora 42 than on Rocky 9.5 Message-ID: References: <7c33f38a52ccff8b94f20c0714b60b61b061ad58.camel@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250506_144605_734337_ECF92F79 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.66 ) X-BeenThere: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "Linux-nvme" Errors-To: linux-nvme-bounces+linux-nvme=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, May 06, 2025 at 02:03:37PM +0300, Anton Gavriliuk wrote: > > So is this MD chunk size related? i.e. what is the chunk size > > the MD device? Is it smaller than the IO size (256kB) or larger? > > Does the regression go away if the chunk size matches the IO size, > > or if the IO size vs chunk size relationship is reversed? > > According to the output below, the chunk size is 512K, Ok. `iostat -dxm 5` output during the fio run on both kernels will give us some indication of the differences in IO patterns, queue depths, etc. Silly question: if you use DM to create the same RAID 0 array with a dm table such as: 0 75011629056 striped 12 1024 /dev/nvme7n1 0 /dev/nvme0n1 0 .... /dev/nvme12n1 0 to create a similar 38TB raid 0 array, do you see the same perf degradation? -Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com