From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 467C5C5B552 for ; Mon, 9 Jun 2025 15:31:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=5gVzdnsBE03ZTIUW+axa3vYf7txkpwMb8tjyPYFWXuI=; b=xGX4UiJdMslkBMtaMzrOsyC5+O TwtFGJLkAxQ34DLss0eHMK9eNxTlF8nLFdkW782MpXqcrJPuZywG5XBTSCHJ5dVUjMS1YltV13f0u 1snLRwcApEuIeS8gphhjbCl9SgBxJMNBhF5Jvsb6RibHxOhaR2X/ikA3mkh2VP+JjdbvplY3Sft70 3m4MRpiPEvsL1db7HXYU8i6TBcgiZMmo/N4rNS6JyNmfqnomMqeY7XK2yGaYYdyveLlowvoKxBtDG YE/x6eSsLA6aRYg9wyuGzZN65do4O2MbC11Z3mm5x1uVfomxREgDIxqVVfymshZVloiSLInolcBlZ hILNKGEA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uOeTX-00000004Wpn-0qvi; Mon, 09 Jun 2025 15:31:51 +0000 Received: from tor.source.kernel.org ([172.105.4.254]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uOe3Q-00000004ST7-2uP1 for linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 09 Jun 2025 15:04:52 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by tor.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFFFF615F2; Mon, 9 Jun 2025 15:04:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 446D8C4CEEB; Mon, 9 Jun 2025 15:04:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1749481491; bh=V9R/MlXkDxF8BcfPqNzbvEqrs6zAbVcZgELa1g9IE3k=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=JSL/Vd3wCBE2pYIJY1CXXvjGJLBptYttI7nc36++QiqsFY+326Whyb0jHu5+h/b8k B/8XM6nroSV7iG6l1PpmKBqyyqA5Zwy1P3n/+z/jI4w5ZUUtjHk5WrKpRZyoH15Mz/ dRyoVQ56uokfoNO8OADQharWJpnnzXLBnBPuYwPoWGimk7t5TqBU5B4+CrJdhplMP2 TCJcmcxlFbhuDQzKbZg9usDlk1A4IamPhRC9ynNOgTKRtleKOcyfJWE/nAktt5GRL/ vsLMzGSwXikIKppTyAl1dzxm5QMud30CAJpNBV5CG47LzrYk6Ds0kzzOirVFXV6CLG tRd32RnIGTDMQ== Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2025 09:04:49 -0600 From: Keith Busch To: Shinichiro Kawasaki Cc: Keith Busch , "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" , "axboe@kernel.dk" Subject: Re: [PATCH blktests] block tests: nvme metadata passthrough Message-ID: References: <20250606003015.3203624-1-kbusch@meta.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "Linux-nvme" Errors-To: linux-nvme-bounces+linux-nvme=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Sat, Jun 07, 2025 at 12:54:50PM +0000, Shinichiro Kawasaki wrote: > On Jun 05, 2025 / 17:30, Keith Busch wrote: > > From: Keith Busch > > > > Get more coverage on nvme metadata passthrough. Specifically in this > > test, read-only metadata is targeted as this had been a gap in previous > > test coveraged. > > Thanks for the patch. I ran the test case on the kernel v6.15, and it passed. > Is this pass result expected? I guess this test case intends to extend test > coverage, and does not intend to recreate the failure reported in the Link. > So, I'm guessing the test case should pass with v6.15 kernel. Oh, I thought it would fail in 6.15, or at least part of this test would have. I changed a lot at the last second before posting, so maybe I messed something up. I'll do another version after making sense of what's going on.