From: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Alan Adamson <alan.adamson@oracle.com>,
John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: What should we do about the nvme atomics mess?
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2025 20:56:58 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aGyI-sl68Y0klsJn@kbusch-mbp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aGyGboLwcn2cXoRo@fedora>
On Tue, Jul 08, 2025 at 10:46:06AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 07, 2025 at 08:27:43PM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 08, 2025 at 09:27:06AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 07, 2025 at 04:18:34PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > I'm a bit lost on what to do about the sad state of NVMe atomic writes.
> > > >
> > > > As a short reminder the main issues are:
> > > >
> > > > 1) there is no flag on a command to request atomic (aka non-torn)
> > > > behavior, instead writes adhering to the atomicy requirements will
> > > > never be torn, and writes not adhering them can be torn any time.
> > > > This differs from SCSI where atomic writes have to be be explicitly
> > > > requested and fail when they can't be satisfied
> > > > 2) the original way to indicate the main atomicy limit is the AWUPF
> > > > field, which is in Identify Controller, but specified in logical
> > > > blocks which only exist at a namespace layer. This a) lead to
> > >
> > > If controller-wide AWUPF is a must property, the length has to be aligned
> > > with block size.
> >
> > What block size? The controller doesn't have one. Block sizes are
>
> It should be any NS format's block size.
That requires an artificial reduction to a meaningless value.
> > properties of namespaces, not controllers or subsystems. If you have 10
> > namespaces with 10 different block formats, what does AUWPF mean? If the
> > controller must report something, the only rational thing it could
> > declare is reduced to the greatest common denominator, which is out of
> > sync with the true value reported in the appropriately scoped NAUWPF
> > value.
>
> Yes, please see the words I quoted from NVMe spec, also `6.4 Atomic Operations`
> mentioned: `NAWUPF >= AWUPF`.
The problem is when Namespace X changes its format that then alters
Namesace Y's reported atomic size. That's unacceptable for any
filesystem utilizing this feature.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-08 2:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-07 14:18 What should we do about the nvme atomics mess? Christoph Hellwig
2025-07-07 14:24 ` Keith Busch
2025-07-07 15:26 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-07-07 15:56 ` Keith Busch
2025-07-07 23:35 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2025-07-08 9:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-07-08 15:19 ` Keith Busch
2025-07-08 1:27 ` Ming Lei
2025-07-08 2:27 ` Keith Busch
2025-07-08 2:46 ` Ming Lei
2025-07-08 2:56 ` Keith Busch [this message]
2025-07-08 3:17 ` Ming Lei
2025-07-08 9:38 ` Niklas Cassel
2025-07-08 9:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-07-08 10:08 ` John Garry
2025-07-09 7:51 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-07-09 21:28 ` Keith Busch
2025-07-10 5:07 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-07-10 7:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-20 13:42 ` John Garry
2025-10-21 15:02 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-10-22 8:50 ` John Garry
2025-10-22 15:24 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-12-08 12:11 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-12-09 8:26 ` John Garry
2026-01-22 10:06 ` Nilay Shroff
2026-01-22 10:16 ` John Garry
2026-01-26 12:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-26 12:58 ` John Garry
2026-01-26 13:01 ` Martin K. Petersen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aGyI-sl68Y0klsJn@kbusch-mbp \
--to=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=alan.adamson@oracle.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox