From: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Keith Busch <kbusch@meta.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
axboe@kernel.dk, leonro@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 1/7] blk-mq-dma: move the bio and bvec_iter to blk_dma_iter
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2025 20:33:02 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aH74XluC0BnerBaQ@kbusch-mbp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250721074223.GF32034@lst.de>
On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 09:42:23AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 20, 2025 at 11:40:34AM -0700, Keith Busch wrote:
> > From: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
> >
> > The req_iterator just happens to have a similar fields to what the dma
> > iterator needs, but we're not necessarily iterating a bio_vec here. Have
> > the dma iterator define its private fields directly. It also helps to
> > remove eyesores like "iter->iter.iter".
>
> Going back to this after looking at the later patches. The level
> for which this iter exists is only called blk_map_* as there is
> nothing dma specific about, just mapping to physical addresses.
>
> So maybe call it blk_map_iter instead?
But the structure yields "dma_addr_t" type values to the consumer.
Whether those are physical addresses or remapped io virtual addresses,
they're still used for direct memory access, so I think the name as-is
is a pretty good fit.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-22 2:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-20 18:40 [PATCHv2 0/7] blk dma iter for metadata Keith Busch
2025-07-20 18:40 ` [PATCHv2 1/7] blk-mq-dma: move the bio and bvec_iter to blk_dma_iter Keith Busch
2025-07-21 7:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-07-21 7:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-07-22 2:33 ` Keith Busch [this message]
2025-07-22 5:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-07-20 18:40 ` [PATCHv2 2/7] blk-mq-dma: set the bvec being iterated Keith Busch
2025-07-21 7:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-07-20 18:40 ` [PATCHv2 3/7] blk-mq-dma: require unmap caller provide p2p map type Keith Busch
2025-07-21 7:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-07-20 18:40 ` [PATCHv2 4/7] blk-mq: remove REQ_P2PDMA flag Keith Busch
2025-07-21 7:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-07-20 18:40 ` [PATCHv2 5/7] blk-mq-dma: move common dma start code to a helper Keith Busch
2025-07-21 7:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-07-20 18:40 ` [PATCHv2 6/7] blk-mq-dma: add support for mapping integrity metadata Keith Busch
2025-07-20 22:51 ` kernel test robot
2025-07-21 3:18 ` kernel test robot
2025-07-21 7:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-07-20 18:40 ` [PATCHv2 7/7] nvme: convert metadata mapping to dma iter Keith Busch
2025-07-21 7:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-07-21 13:15 ` Keith Busch
2025-07-22 5:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aH74XluC0BnerBaQ@kbusch-mbp \
--to=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kbusch@meta.com \
--cc=leonro@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox