From: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Keith Busch <kbusch@meta.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
axboe@kernel.dk
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] block: accumulate segment page gaps per bio
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2025 13:22:17 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aKYgacJZCQEx1kf1@kbusch-mbp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250811161756.GA25496@lst.de>
On Mon, Aug 11, 2025 at 06:17:56PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2025 at 09:27:18AM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> > I initially tried to copy the nsegs usage in the request, but there are
> > multiple places (iomap, xfs, and btrfs) that split to hardware limits
> > without a request, so I'm not sure where the result is supposed to go to
> > be referenced later. Or do those all call the same split function later
> > in the generic block layer, in which case it shouldn't matter if the
> > upper layers already called it?
>
> Yes, we'll always end up calling into __bio_split_to_limits in blk-mq,
> no matter if someone split before. The upper layer splits are only
> for zone append users that can't later be split, but
> __bio_split_to_limits is stilled called on them to count the segments
> and to assert that they don't need splitting.
Zone write plugging presents a problem. For the same reason that
"__bi_nr_segments" exists, I have to stash this result somewhere in the
bio struct. I mentioned earlier I just need one byte, and there's a byte
hole in the bio already, so won't need to increase the size.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-20 23:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-05 19:56 [PATCH 1/2] block: accumulate segment page gaps per bio Keith Busch
2025-08-05 19:56 ` [PATCH 2/2] nvme: remove virtual boundary for sgl capable devices Keith Busch
2025-08-06 14:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-08-06 15:04 ` Keith Busch
2025-08-05 20:32 ` [PATCH 1/2] block: accumulate segment page gaps per bio Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-08-05 20:52 ` Keith Busch
2025-08-05 22:52 ` Keith Busch
2025-08-06 14:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-08-06 15:17 ` Keith Busch
2025-08-06 14:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-08-06 15:44 ` Keith Busch
2025-08-10 14:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-08-11 15:27 ` Keith Busch
2025-08-11 16:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-08-20 19:22 ` Keith Busch [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aKYgacJZCQEx1kf1@kbusch-mbp \
--to=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kbusch@meta.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox