* [PATCH v3] nvme: nvme_identify_ns_descs: prevent oob
@ 2025-12-01 19:43 Eugene Korenevsky
2025-12-02 0:27 ` Keith Busch
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Eugene Korenevsky @ 2025-12-01 19:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Keith Busch, Jens Axboe, Christoph Hellwig, Sagi Grimberg,
linux-nvme, linux-kernel
Broken or malicious controller can send invalid ns id.
Out-of-band memory access may occur if remaining buffer size
is less than .nidl (ns id length) field of `struct nvme_ns_id_desc`
Fix this issue by checking (header size + .nidl) against
remaining buffer length.
Also small minor related fix: `pos` should be unsigned size_t,
not signed int.
Signed-off-by: Eugene Korenevsky <ekorenevsky@aliyun.com>
---
v1->v2:
* Simplification: do not touch nvme_process_ns_desc()
* Update commit description
v2->v3:
* Even more simplification
* Replace while with do-while as first pre-loop condition
check is pointless
* Change `pos` type: int -> size_t
* Update commit description
---
drivers/nvme/host/core.c | 17 ++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
index f1f719351f3f..73263545e3cd 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
@@ -1538,8 +1538,10 @@ static int nvme_identify_ns_descs(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl,
{
struct nvme_command c = { };
bool csi_seen = false;
- int status, pos, len;
+ int status, len;
+ size_t pos;
void *data;
+ struct nvme_ns_id_desc *cur;
if (ctrl->vs < NVME_VS(1, 3, 0) && !nvme_multi_css(ctrl))
return 0;
@@ -1563,18 +1565,23 @@ static int nvme_identify_ns_descs(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl,
goto free_data;
}
- for (pos = 0; pos < NVME_IDENTIFY_DATA_SIZE; pos += len) {
- struct nvme_ns_id_desc *cur = data + pos;
+ pos = 0;
+ do {
+ cur = data + pos;
if (cur->nidl == 0)
break;
+ /* check ns id desc does not exceed remaining buffer by size */
+ if (cur->nidl + sizeof(*cur) > NVME_IDENTIFY_DATA_SIZE - pos)
+ break;
len = nvme_process_ns_desc(ctrl, &info->ids, cur, &csi_seen);
if (len < 0)
break;
- len += sizeof(*cur);
- }
+ pos += sizeof(*cur);
+ pos += len;
+ } while (pos < NVME_IDENTIFY_DATA_SIZE - sizeof(*cur));
if (nvme_multi_css(ctrl) && !csi_seen) {
dev_warn(ctrl->device, "Command set not reported for nsid:%d\n",
--
2.47.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3] nvme: nvme_identify_ns_descs: prevent oob
2025-12-01 19:43 [PATCH v3] nvme: nvme_identify_ns_descs: prevent oob Eugene Korenevsky
@ 2025-12-02 0:27 ` Keith Busch
2025-12-02 5:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-02 20:30 ` Eugene Korenevsky
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Keith Busch @ 2025-12-02 0:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eugene Korenevsky
Cc: Jens Axboe, Christoph Hellwig, Sagi Grimberg, linux-nvme,
linux-kernel
On Mon, Dec 01, 2025 at 10:43:23PM +0300, Eugene Korenevsky wrote:
> - for (pos = 0; pos < NVME_IDENTIFY_DATA_SIZE; pos += len) {
> - struct nvme_ns_id_desc *cur = data + pos;
> + pos = 0;
> + do {
> + cur = data + pos;
>
> if (cur->nidl == 0)
> break;
> + /* check ns id desc does not exceed remaining buffer by size */
> + if (cur->nidl + sizeof(*cur) > NVME_IDENTIFY_DATA_SIZE - pos)
> + break;
>
> len = nvme_process_ns_desc(ctrl, &info->ids, cur, &csi_seen);
> if (len < 0)
> break;
>
> - len += sizeof(*cur);
> - }
> + pos += sizeof(*cur);
> + pos += len;
> + } while (pos < NVME_IDENTIFY_DATA_SIZE - sizeof(*cur));
I don't want bikeshed this, but I thought this looked better as a
for-loop. You can just modify the continuing condition instead of
changing the loop type to do-while.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3] nvme: nvme_identify_ns_descs: prevent oob
2025-12-02 0:27 ` Keith Busch
@ 2025-12-02 5:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-02 20:30 ` Eugene Korenevsky
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2025-12-02 5:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Keith Busch
Cc: Eugene Korenevsky, Jens Axboe, Christoph Hellwig, Sagi Grimberg,
linux-nvme, linux-kernel
On Mon, Dec 01, 2025 at 05:27:48PM -0700, Keith Busch wrote:
> I don't want bikeshed this, but I thought this looked better as a
> for-loop. You can just modify the continuing condition instead of
> changing the loop type to do-while.
The reason I went for the while in my whiteboard coding is that it
would allow for keeping len local inside the loop, which I like
in general. The actual patch doesn't do this anyway, and I don't
care too strongly, so I'm fine with the somewhat more natural for
loop as well.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3] nvme: nvme_identify_ns_descs: prevent oob
2025-12-02 0:27 ` Keith Busch
2025-12-02 5:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
@ 2025-12-02 20:30 ` Eugene Korenevsky
2025-12-02 20:34 ` Keith Busch
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Eugene Korenevsky @ 2025-12-02 20:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Keith Busch
Cc: Jens Axboe, Christoph Hellwig, Sagi Grimberg, linux-nvme,
linux-kernel
> > - for (pos = 0; pos < NVME_IDENTIFY_DATA_SIZE; pos += len) {
> > - struct nvme_ns_id_desc *cur = data + pos;
> > + pos = 0;
> > + do {
> > + } while (pos < NVME_IDENTIFY_DATA_SIZE - sizeof(*cur));
> I don't want bikeshed this, but I thought this looked better as a
> for-loop. You can just modify the continuing condition instead of
> changing the loop type to do-while.
OK, tried to make the patch as close as possible to previous code.
See v4.
Also, adding 'pos += len' to modified `for` makes the line longer
than 80 symbols. However, checkpatch.pl says it is OK. Let me know
if it should be fixed somehow (e.g. by moving 'pos += len' to the
end of loop compound statement).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3] nvme: nvme_identify_ns_descs: prevent oob
2025-12-02 20:30 ` Eugene Korenevsky
@ 2025-12-02 20:34 ` Keith Busch
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Keith Busch @ 2025-12-02 20:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eugene Korenevsky
Cc: Jens Axboe, Christoph Hellwig, Sagi Grimberg, linux-nvme,
linux-kernel
On Tue, Dec 02, 2025 at 11:30:04PM +0300, Eugene Korenevsky wrote:
> OK, tried to make the patch as close as possible to previous code.
> See v4.
Yep, I saw. Mostly looks good to me.
> Also, adding 'pos += len' to modified `for` makes the line longer
> than 80 symbols. However, checkpatch.pl says it is OK. Let me know
> if it should be fixed somehow (e.g. by moving 'pos += len' to the
> end of loop compound statement).
The convention for this driver is to wrap lines at 80 characters. But
don't worry about sending a new version for just that; I can fix that
when applying.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-12-02 20:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-12-01 19:43 [PATCH v3] nvme: nvme_identify_ns_descs: prevent oob Eugene Korenevsky
2025-12-02 0:27 ` Keith Busch
2025-12-02 5:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-02 20:30 ` Eugene Korenevsky
2025-12-02 20:34 ` Keith Busch
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox