From: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
To: Israel Rukshin <israelr@nvidia.com>
Cc: Linux-nvme <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>, Nitzan Carmi <nitzanc@nvidia.com>,
Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] nvmet-rdma: Use kvcalloc for commands and responses arrays
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2025 12:35:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aSSziMs_1JPxeowN@kbusch-mbp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1763966961-32140-1-git-send-email-israelr@nvidia.com>
On Mon, Nov 24, 2025 at 08:49:20AM +0200, Israel Rukshin wrote:
> Replace kcalloc with kvcalloc for allocation of the commands and
> responses arrays. Each command structure is 272 bytes and each
> response structure is 672 bytes. These arrays typically exceed a
> single page, and grow much larger with high queue depths
> (e.g., commands >2MB, responses >170KB)
>
> kvcalloc automatically falls back to vmalloc for large or fragmented
> allocations, improving reliability. In our case, this memory is not
> aimed for DMA operations and could be safely allocated by kvcalloc.
> Using virtually contiguous memory helps to avoid allocation failures
> and out-of-memory conditions common with kcalloc on large pools.
Thanks, applied to nvme-6.19.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-24 19:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-24 6:49 [PATCH 1/2] nvmet-rdma: Use kvcalloc for commands and responses arrays Israel Rukshin
2025-11-24 6:49 ` [PATCH 2/2] nvmet-tcp: Use kvcalloc for commands array Israel Rukshin
2025-11-24 14:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-30 22:52 ` Sagi Grimberg
2025-11-24 14:24 ` [PATCH 1/2] nvmet-rdma: Use kvcalloc for commands and responses arrays Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-24 19:35 ` Keith Busch [this message]
2025-11-30 22:52 ` Sagi Grimberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aSSziMs_1JPxeowN@kbusch-mbp \
--to=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=israelr@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mgurtovoy@nvidia.com \
--cc=nitzanc@nvidia.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox