public inbox for linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: Sungwoo Kim <iam@sung-woo.kim>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Harshit Mogalapalli <harshit.m.mogalapalli@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme: remove bogus check in nvme_pr_read_keys()
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2026 11:53:23 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <acF-E8csusg-YbaO@kbusch-mbp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ab5yUf3BqtlN3K-P@stanley.mountain>

On Sat, Mar 21, 2026 at 01:26:25PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> This check for if (rse_len > U32_MAX) is confusing because if
> rse_len is > INT_MAX, that will trigger a WARN() in kvzalloc().
> Fortunately, the caller blkdev_pr_read_keys(), puts a limit on num_keys.
> The number of keys can't be more than PR_KEYS_MAX (65536) and the
> condition is impossible.

There's actually two callers: blkdev_pr_read_keys() ensures the number of
keys is smaller than 65536 and iblock_pr_read_keys() is a fixed size at
16. But begs the question, what guarantee does nvme_pr_read_keys() have
that all the callers validated the number of keys such that it can
bravely skip checking it? I think nvme should validate that it's a
reasonable value before calling kvalloc so we return an apporpriate
EINVAL instead of ENOMEM. The existing UINT_MAX check is certainly far
too high, but I think something like a 4MB payload would be a totally
reasonable upper limit for nvme on this function.


  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-23 17:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-21 10:26 [PATCH] nvme: remove bogus check in nvme_pr_read_keys() Dan Carpenter
2026-03-23 17:53 ` Keith Busch [this message]
2026-03-24  6:53   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-24  7:05   ` Dan Carpenter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=acF-E8csusg-YbaO@kbusch-mbp \
    --to=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
    --cc=harshit.m.mogalapalli@oracle.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=iam@sung-woo.kim \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox