From: Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanyak@nvidia.com>
To: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@gmail.com>
Cc: "james.p.freyensee@intel.com" <james.p.freyensee@intel.com>,
"hch@lst.de" <hch@lst.de>,
"kbusch@kernel.org" <kbusch@kernel.org>,
"linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>,
"ming.l@ssi.samsung.com" <ming.l@ssi.samsung.com>,
"larrystevenwise@gmail.com" <larrystevenwise@gmail.com>,
"anthony.j.knapp@intel.com" <anthony.j.knapp@intel.com>,
"pizhenwei@bytedance.com" <pizhenwei@bytedance.com>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>, "axboe@fb.com" <axboe@fb.com>,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanyak@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] nvme: fix delete uninitialized controller
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2023 00:24:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <af53be64-4ed3-96ea-7700-ac8f0cc8de6b@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b6b16a5a-d592-eb12-ea30-1535b80d60dc@grimberg.me>
On 1/3/23 02:30, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
>> nvme-fabric controllers can be deleted by
>> /sys/class/nvme/nvme<NS>/delete_controller
>> echo 1 > /sys/class/nvme/nvme<NS>/delete_controller
>> The above command will call nvme_delete_ctrl_sync().
>> This function internally tries to change ctrl->state to
>> NVME_CTRL_DELETING.
>> NVME_CTRL_LIVE, NVME_CTRL_RESETTING, and NVME_CTRL_CONNECTING states can
>> be changed to NVME_CTRL_DELETING.
>> If the state is successfully changed, nvme_do_delete_ctrl() is called,
>> which is the actual delete logic of controller.
>>
>> controller initialization logic changes ctrl->state.
>> NEW -> CONNECTING -> LIVE.
>> NVME_CTRL_CONNECTING state doesn't ensure that initialization is done.
>>
>> So, delete logic can be called before the finish of controller
>> initialization.
>> So kernel panic would occur because nvme_do_delete_ctrl() dereferences
>> uninitialized values.
thanks for discovering this, do you perhaps have sequence of commands to
reproduce this ?
[...]
>> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
>> @@ -243,7 +243,8 @@ static void nvme_delete_ctrl_sync(struct nvme_ctrl
>> *ctrl)
>> * since ->delete_ctrl can free the controller.
>> */
>> nvme_get_ctrl(ctrl);
>> - if (nvme_change_ctrl_state(ctrl, NVME_CTRL_DELETING))
>> + if (test_bit(NVME_CTRL_STARTED_ONCE, &ctrl->flags) &&
>> + nvme_change_ctrl_state(ctrl, NVME_CTRL_DELETING))
>> nvme_do_delete_ctrl(ctrl);
>
> So what is the outcome now? if the controller kept on dangling? what
> triggers the controller deletion?
>
>> nvme_put_ctrl(ctrl);
>> }
>
> I don't think this is the correct approach.
> the delete should fully fence the initialization and then delete
> the controller.
>
> In this case, the transport driver should not quiesce a non-existent
> queue.
>
> If further synchronization is needed, then it should be added so that
> delete will fully fence the initialization.
as stated here I'd add complete fencing for the initialization and
delete transition ..
-ck
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-04 0:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-03 10:03 [PATCH 0/4] nvme: fix several bugs in nvme-fabric Taehee Yoo
2023-01-03 10:03 ` [PATCH 1/4] nvme: fix delete uninitialized controller Taehee Yoo
2023-01-03 10:30 ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-01-04 0:24 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni [this message]
2023-01-04 2:42 ` Taehee Yoo
2023-01-03 10:03 ` [PATCH 2/4] nvme: fix reset " Taehee Yoo
2023-01-03 10:32 ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-01-03 10:03 ` [PATCH 3/4] nvmet: fix hang in nvmet_ns_disable() Taehee Yoo
2023-01-03 10:58 ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-01-04 0:32 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2023-01-04 8:56 ` Taehee Yoo
2023-01-03 10:03 ` [PATCH 4/4] nvmet-tcp: fix memory leak in nvmet_tcp_free_cmd_data_in_buffers() Taehee Yoo
2023-01-03 10:54 ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-01-04 8:44 ` Taehee Yoo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=af53be64-4ed3-96ea-7700-ac8f0cc8de6b@nvidia.com \
--to=chaitanyak@nvidia.com \
--cc=anthony.j.knapp@intel.com \
--cc=ap420073@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=james.p.freyensee@intel.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=larrystevenwise@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=ming.l@ssi.samsung.com \
--cc=pizhenwei@bytedance.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox