public inbox for linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guixin Liu <kanie@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Uday Shankar <ushankar@purestorage.com>, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
	Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>, Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] nvme: scan sequentially only when list scan unsupported
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2022 15:25:31 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <afbef74b-5bf3-1db1-bde9-ee856c364eb5@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fd44f173-bcb1-582a-5344-fb5e28ed4d6b@linux.alibaba.com>


在 2022/11/8 10:30, Guixin Liu 写道:
> nvme_ctrl_limited_cns check in nvme_scan_ns_list can be removed.
>
Sorry, my bad, already removed.
> Best regards.
>
> Guixin Liu
>
>
> 在 2022/11/8 03:54, Uday Shankar 写道:
>> Currently, if nvme_scan_ns_list fails, nvme_scan_work will fall back to
>> a sequential scan. nvme_scan_ns_list can fail for a variety of reasons,
>> e.g. transient transport issue. And the resulting sequential scan can be
>> extremely expensive on controllers reporting an NN value close to the
>> maximum allowed (>4 billion). Avoid sequential scans wherever possible
>> by only falling back to them if nvme_scan_ns_list fails due to
>> controller non-support of Identify NS List. This breaks (noncompliant)
>> devices that claim to support version NVME_VS(1, 1, 0) or later, but
>> don't support Identify NS List. Such devices can be made to work again
>> using the existing NVME_QUIRK_IDENTIFY_CNS.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Uday Shankar <ushankar@purestorage.com>
>> ---
>> Changes from v1:
>> - Move limited_cns check from nvme_scan_ns_list to nvme_scan_work
>> - Move note about devices that may break with this change into commit
>>    message
>>
>>   drivers/nvme/host/core.c | 7 +++----
>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
>> index 0090dc0b3ae6..5abd8d4c6d9b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
>> @@ -4425,9 +4425,6 @@ static int nvme_scan_ns_list(struct nvme_ctrl 
>> *ctrl)
>>       u32 prev = 0;
>>       int ret = 0, i;
>>   -    if (nvme_ctrl_limited_cns(ctrl))
>> -        return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> -
>>       ns_list = kzalloc(NVME_IDENTIFY_DATA_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
>>       if (!ns_list)
>>           return -ENOMEM;
>> @@ -4535,8 +4532,10 @@ static void nvme_scan_work(struct work_struct 
>> *work)
>>       }
>>         mutex_lock(&ctrl->scan_lock);
>> -    if (nvme_scan_ns_list(ctrl) != 0)
>> +    if (nvme_ctrl_limited_cns(ctrl))
>>           nvme_scan_ns_sequential(ctrl);
>> +    else
>> +        nvme_scan_ns_list(ctrl);
>>       mutex_unlock(&ctrl->scan_lock);
>>   }
>>
>> base-commit: d30a909f9bb5283e701a5fdfffac763ef57a3e7c


  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-08  7:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-07 19:54 [PATCH v2] nvme: scan sequentially only when list scan unsupported Uday Shankar
2022-11-08  2:30 ` Guixin Liu
2022-11-08  7:25   ` Guixin Liu [this message]
2022-11-08 23:38 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2022-11-08 23:41 ` Keith Busch
2022-11-09  6:23   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-09 21:04     ` Uday Shankar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=afbef74b-5bf3-1db1-bde9-ee856c364eb5@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=kanie@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    --cc=ushankar@purestorage.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox