Linux-NVME Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
To: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
Cc: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
	Shivam Kumar <kumar.shivam43666@gmail.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Chaitanya Kulkarni <Chaitanya.Kulkarni@wdc.com>,
	security@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvmet-tcp: Fix potential UAF when ddgst mismatch
Date: Mon, 11 May 2026 08:59:56 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <agHu7NoaTWC2ksJA@kbusch-mbp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260510203029.119712-1-sagi@grimberg.me>

On Sun, May 10, 2026 at 11:30:29PM +0300, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> Shivam Kumar found via vulnerability testing:
> When data digest is enabled on an NVMe/TCP connection and a digest
> mismatch occurs on a non-final H2C_DATA PDU during an R2T-based
> data transfer, the digest error handler in nvmet_tcp_try_recv_ddgst()
> calls nvmet_req_uninit() - which performs percpu_ref_put() on the
> submission queue - but does NOT mark the command as completed. It
> does not set cqe->status, does not modify rbytes_done, and does not
> clear any flag. When the subsequent fatal error triggers queue
> teardown, nvmet_tcp_uninit_data_in_cmds() iterates all commands,
> checks nvmet_tcp_need_data_in() for each one, and finds that the
> already-uninited command still appears to need data (because
> rbytes_done < transfer_len and cqe->status == 0). It therefore calls
> nvmet_req_uninit() a second time on the same command - a double
> percpu_ref_put against a single percpu_ref_get.

Thanks, applied to nvme-7.1.


      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-05-11 15:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-10 20:30 [PATCH] nvmet-tcp: Fix potential UAF when ddgst mismatch Sagi Grimberg
2026-05-11  6:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-05-11 14:59 ` Keith Busch [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=agHu7NoaTWC2ksJA@kbusch-mbp \
    --to=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=Chaitanya.Kulkarni@wdc.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=kumar.shivam43666@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    --cc=security@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox