Linux-NVME Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: keith.busch@intel.com (Keith Busch)
Subject: Question on IOStat accounting
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 09:31:35 -0600 (MDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.03.1409230745540.4696@AMR> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <08f801cfd701$b1b8c850$152a58f0$@samsung.com>

On Tue, 23 Sep 2014, Indraneel Mukherjee wrote:
> If nvme_submit_bio_queue() fails to queue the IOD, the BIO gets queued in
> the sq_cong BIO list.
> But we don't start accounting for this immediately even though the BIO is
> now queued up with the Driver.
> Any particular reason for this? Is it because it's a rare scenario we're
> talking about here?

Hi Indraneel,

This seems more-or-less consistent with request based block drivers. The
main reason you'd get bios queued on the bio_list is if you're out of
memory, and request based drivers wouldn't start accounting if it couldn't
allocate memory either; if you're out of memory, you've probably bigger
problems than iostats, so hopefully it's a rare scenario.

The other reason you'd get bio's queued is if we're splitting them,
but then that kicks the kthread to immediatly send the two parts within
a jiffie, so the accounting is probably not affected there.

>
>> On Wed, 17 Sep 2014, Indraneel Mukherjee wrote:
>>> In the current implementation of IO accounting in the nvme driver,
>>> accounting is started once IOD is successfully prepared.
>>> Thereafter 2 cases can happen, either IO gets successfully submitted
>>> to device or it can get queued up in the IOD list if there is a failure.
>>>
>>> So what's the definition of iostat here? In-flight in the device or
>>> in-flight in the driver ? Is there a need to make this consistent?
>>
>> It seems consistent with other block drivers. Usually stats are handled
>> above the device driver at the request layer, but bio-based drivers handle
>> the stats on their own.

      reply	other threads:[~2014-09-23 15:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-17 12:32 Question on IOStat accounting Indraneel Mukherjee
2014-09-17 14:28 ` Keith Busch
2014-09-23  7:40   ` Indraneel Mukherjee
2014-09-23 15:31     ` Keith Busch [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LRH.2.03.1409230745540.4696@AMR \
    --to=keith.busch@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox