From: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
To: Hari Mishal <harimishal1@gmail.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
Kanchan Joshi <joshi.k@samsung.com>,
Nitesh Shetty <nj.shetty@samsung.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] nvme: drop WARN_ON_ONCE on write_stream bounds check
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2026 08:24:40 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <amdqKEI44SKwq-K2@kbusch-mbp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260725135111.14041-3-harimishal1@gmail.com>
On Sat, Jul 25, 2026 at 03:51:11PM +0200, Hari Mishal wrote:
> write_stream is validated against bdev_max_write_streams() in both
> generic block direct I/O (block/fops.c) and F2FS before a bio
> carrying it is ever built, so write_stream > nr_plids shouldn't be
> reachable through any current legitimate path. The remaining users
> of bio->bi_write_stream elsewhere in the block layer only copy an
> already-validated value between bios (bio.c, blk-crypto-fallback.c)
> or compare it for merge eligibility (blk-merge.c); none of them
> introduce a new, unvalidated value.
>
> Using WARN_ON_ONCE as the backstop for that assumption isn't worth
> it given how many deployed systems run with panic-on-warn enabled;
> the existing graceful return BLK_STS_INVAL already handles it on
> its own.
That's not a very good reason to remove a WARN_ON. You've left the check
in for a condition that should never happen, so when it does happen,
it'll be impossible to debug without the WARN.
And the WARN also annotates the branch as unlikely, which is desirable
for this case.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-27 14:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-25 13:51 [PATCH 0/2] nvme: fix racy access to FDP placement ID array Hari Mishal
2026-07-25 13:51 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Hari Mishal
2026-07-27 13:31 ` Kanchan Joshi
2026-07-27 14:22 ` Kanchan Joshi
2026-07-25 13:51 ` [PATCH 2/2] nvme: drop WARN_ON_ONCE on write_stream bounds check Hari Mishal
2026-07-27 14:24 ` Keith Busch [this message]
2026-07-27 19:19 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-07-27 22:51 ` Keith Busch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=amdqKEI44SKwq-K2@kbusch-mbp \
--to=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=harimishal1@gmail.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=joshi.k@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=nj.shetty@samsung.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox