Linux-NVME Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
To: Chao Shi <coshi036@gmail.com>
Cc: hch@lst.de, sagi@grimberg.me, axboe@kernel.dk,
	joshi.k@samsung.com, weizhu@fiu.edu,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme: reject zoned namespaces whose zone info query failed
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2026 13:28:47 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <an9sbzM52QqKdQuP@kbusch-mbp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260814160954.2839507-1-coshi036@gmail.com>

On Fri, Aug 14, 2026 at 12:09:54PM -0400, Chao Shi wrote:
> Before commit c85c9ab926a5 ("nvme: split nvme_update_zone_info") the
> caller tested "if (ret)" and bailed out on any non-zero return.  Restore
> that behaviour.

I think the namespace is generally left up on purpose for controller
reported errors so that we have a device handle for admin debugging
purposes.

Can you just skip the zone limits update when you have a bad response?
Something like:

--- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
@@ -2457,7 +2457,8 @@ static int nvme_update_ns_info_block(struct nvme_ns *ns,
                capacity = 0;

        if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ZONED) &&
-           ns->head->ids.csi == NVME_CSI_ZNS)
+           ns->head->ids.csi == NVME_CSI_ZNS &&
+           zi.max_open_zones)
                nvme_update_zone_info(ns, &lim, &zi);

        if ((ns->ctrl->vwc & NVME_CTRL_VWC_PRESENT) && !info->no_vwc)


      reply	other threads:[~2026-08-14 19:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-14 16:09 [PATCH] nvme: reject zoned namespaces whose zone info query failed Chao Shi
2026-08-14 19:28 ` Keith Busch [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=an9sbzM52QqKdQuP@kbusch-mbp \
    --to=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=coshi036@gmail.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=joshi.k@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=weizhu@fiu.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox