Linux-NVME Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
To: Guixin Liu <kanie@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
	Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>,
	Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] nvme: reject a reconnect_delay of 0 through sysfs
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2026 10:54:55 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <avII73yoEjhR0v3l@kbusch-mbp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261109022646.290792-2-kanie@linux.alibaba.com>

On Mon, Nov 09, 2026 at 10:26:42AM +0800, Guixin Liu wrote:
> nvme_ctrl_reconnect_delay_store() accepts any value the option parser
> also accepts, except that it misses the lower bound: writing 0 is
> rejected by nvmf_parse_options() but not by the sysfs attribute.
> nvme_ctrl_loss_tmo_store() then divides by opts->reconnect_delay in
> DIV_ROUND_UP(), so writing 0 followed by any ctrl_loss_tmo update
> crashes the kernel with a division by zero.
> 
> Reject 0 like the option parser does.

There was another patch sent earlier with an identical fix posted here:

  https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nvme/20261105215807526OqR0Bg86VChvwhCEz5xGr@zte.com.cn/

I ended up applying the one that published first, but removed the
unnecessary code comments.


  reply	other threads:[~2026-11-09 17:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-09  2:26 [PATCH v2 0/5] nvme: fabrics and target fixes Guixin Liu
2026-11-09  2:26 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] nvme: reject a reconnect_delay of 0 through sysfs Guixin Liu
2026-11-09 17:54   ` Keith Busch [this message]
2026-11-10  2:36     ` Guixin Liu
2026-11-09  2:26 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] nvme-fc: fix use-after-free in nvme_fc_match_disconn_ls() Guixin Liu
2026-11-09  2:26 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] nvme-auth: fix data race on ctrl->transaction Guixin Liu
2026-11-09  2:31   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-09 17:10   ` Keith Busch
2026-11-10  2:34     ` Guixin Liu
2026-11-09  2:26 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] nvmet: take subsys->lock in nvmet_subsys_attr_tbkas_store() Guixin Liu
2026-11-09  2:26 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] nvmet: use GFP_KERNEL for PR allocations Guixin Liu
2026-11-09 17:47 ` (subset) [PATCH v2 0/5] nvme: fabrics and target fixes Keith Busch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=avII73yoEjhR0v3l@kbusch-mbp \
    --to=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=dwagner@suse.de \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=kanie@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=nilay@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox