From: yaoma <yaoma@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, hch@lst.de, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kanie@linux.alibaba.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme: fix deadlock between reset and scan
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2023 11:28:40 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bd4340ab-566f-986a-afa9-8c6627ea632e@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c47a0edd-7437-4c21-b7cf-f969ff85bf78@grimberg.me>
On 2023/11/28 18:13, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
>
>
> On 11/28/23 08:22, yaoma wrote:
>> Hi Keith Busch
>>
>> Thanks for your reply.
>>
>> The idea to avoid such a deadlock between nvme_reset and nvme_scan is
>> to ensure that no namespace can be added to ctrl->namespaces after
>> nvme_start_freeze has already been called. We can achieve this goal by
>> assessing the ctrl->state after we have already acquired the
>> ctrl->namespaces_rwsem lock, to decide whether to add the namespace to
>> the list or not.
>> 1. After we determine that ctrl->state is LIVE, it may be immediately
>> changed to another state. However, since we have already acquired the
>> lock, other tasks cannot access ctrl->namespace, so we can still
>> safely add the namespace to the list. After acquiring the lock,
>> nvme_start_freeze will freeze all ns->q in the list, including any
>> newly added namespaces.
>> 2. Before the completion of nvme_reset, ctrl->state will not be
>> changed to LIVE, so we will not add any more namespaces to the list.
>> All ns->q in the list is frozen, so nvme_wait_freeze can exit normally.
>
> I agree with the analysis, there is a hole between start_freeze and
> freeze_wait that a scan may add a ns to the ctrl ns list.
>
I think your proposal is nice, and I will test it.
> However the fix should be to mark the ctrl with say NVME_CTRL_FROZEN
> flag set in nvme_freeze_start and cleared in nvme_unfreeze (similar
> to what we did with quiesce). Then the scan can check it before adding
> the new namespace (under the namespaces_rwsem).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-29 3:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-23 11:00 [PATCH] nvme: fix deadlock between reset and scan Bitao Hu
2023-11-27 18:07 ` Keith Busch
2023-11-28 6:22 ` yaoma
2023-11-28 10:13 ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-11-28 18:00 ` Keith Busch
2023-11-29 3:23 ` yaoma
2023-11-29 3:28 ` yaoma [this message]
2023-11-29 9:24 ` yaoma
2023-11-30 2:13 ` [PATCH v2] " Bitao Hu
2023-11-30 22:28 ` Keith Busch
2023-12-04 7:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-12-04 8:15 ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-12-04 8:35 ` Guixin Liu
2023-12-04 16:39 ` Keith Busch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bd4340ab-566f-986a-afa9-8c6627ea632e@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=yaoma@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kanie@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox