Linux-NVME Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanyak@nvidia.com>
To: Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>,
	"linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>
Cc: "hch@lst.de" <hch@lst.de>,
	"kbusch@kernel.org" <kbusch@kernel.org>,
	"sagi@grimberg.me" <sagi@grimberg.me>,
	"gjoyce@linux.ibm.com" <gjoyce@linux.ibm.com>,
	"axboe@fb.com" <axboe@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3] nvme: find numa distance only if controller has valid numa id
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 09:07:10 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c0dd0177-20d2-4d7b-aa44-ee29b2117c30@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240416082102.914152-1-nilay@linux.ibm.com>

On 4/16/2024 1:19 AM, Nilay Shroff wrote:
> On system where native nvme multipath is configured and iopolicy
> is set to numa but the nvme controller numa node id is undefined
> or -1 (NUMA_NO_NODE) then avoid calculating node distance for
> finding optimal io path. In such case we may access numa distance
> table with invalid index and that may potentially refer to incorrect
> memory. So this patch ensures that if the nvme controller numa node
> id is -1 then instead of calculating node distance for finding optimal
> io path, we set the numa node distance of such controller to default 10
> (LOCAL_DISTANCE).
> 
> Link:https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240413090614.678353-1-nilay@linux.ibm.com/
> Signed-off-by: Nilay Shroff<nilay@linux.ibm.com>

Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>

-ck



  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-16  9:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-16  8:19 [PATCHv3] nvme: find numa distance only if controller has valid numa id Nilay Shroff
2024-04-16  9:07 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni [this message]
2024-04-16  9:43 ` Sagi Grimberg
2024-04-16 15:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-04-16 16:44 ` Keith Busch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c0dd0177-20d2-4d7b-aa44-ee29b2117c30@nvidia.com \
    --to=chaitanyak@nvidia.com \
    --cc=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=gjoyce@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=nilay@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox