From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41E47C64E7C for ; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 01:24:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8683C221FB for ; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 01:24:28 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 8683C221FB Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-nvme-bounces+linux-nvme=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Mime-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Date:To:From: Subject:Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=Mw2wc1IkkRoyesOXUGPeuqrUymmOwZTcDDtsWZpyj7k=; b=aq4Yyc9SqnlHh6T7wR+zt4QY3 xNv6OMs9BwGtu62S986glqZ+TVCw5uE5EFk978+se9HZMjNcblFXsVg77HIxqFaUGpknXz1rdnSnf TrZWvTFwiD1DbeKbWjfH73ccDyiOZU7UPPLFnDlv06tKD3CP/X5uXlCgjYnxRQjc5Sq2/oFb3lSnQ WC4uoCnaytfdYma+ujK0i/aIOP92vWFbM7WkuLtNiRUfKmpDVTqdIGFdjAOO4mhzfWMmjOb+aHr+2 PdSk83qizTDxxQ34kwozR9Dxq+lmYxh/Aw1i26K8H3RfxLrVKCoG3e7l3DLUn8dHVYt/rHa7OPPJK lLj/k2bzw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kkdM5-0003Kc-U0; Thu, 03 Dec 2020 01:24:21 +0000 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kkdM0-0003K0-IQ for linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2020 01:24:18 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1606958655; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=BnB6KEGreP4BJbO64pikkiDEYWis3mZbnxN7CY98rMw=; b=Hz/gJs/1pzjZSBsNnhciV25dmV/dutIZ8iBVyx0z6F4xpi0lMfGerpoNeHnLeCK3vZ5JWd BUGP8uCLYLpez+7HyCEj1eM9zkCmhYztPccnjQyi03VLZQJ+GmtzoI7AohuR5yTBZD7PF/ t2ebD7S7/LQd2olFzguq2pPqWSK6RQE= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-521-Dtml8vCjOzaToCuTRuXPMw-1; Wed, 02 Dec 2020 20:24:08 -0500 X-MC-Unique: Dtml8vCjOzaToCuTRuXPMw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D932805BF1; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 01:24:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ovpn-66-132.rdu2.redhat.com (unknown [10.10.67.132]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 123AC60BFA; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 01:23:59 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] blk-mq/nvme-loop: use nvme-loop's lock class for addressing lockdep false positive warning From: Qian Cai To: Ming Lei Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2020 20:23:58 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20201203005035.GA540033@T590> References: <20201112075526.947079-1-ming.lei@redhat.com> <20201130023606.GC230145@T590> <20201203005035.GA540033@T590> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20201202_202416_683854_9817229F X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 17.86 ) X-BeenThere: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Jens Axboe , Bart Van Assche , John Garry , linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, Kashyap Desai , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Sumit Saxena , Hannes Reinecke , Christoph Hellwig Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "Linux-nvme" Errors-To: linux-nvme-bounces+linux-nvme=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, 2020-12-03 at 08:50 +0800, Ming Lei wrote: > On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 02:07:08PM -0500, Qian Cai wrote: > > On Mon, 2020-11-30 at 10:36 +0800, Ming Lei wrote: > > > Any chance to take a look? And this issue has been reported several > > > times in RH internal test. > > > > I suppose that you will need to rebase as it does not apply cleanly on > > today's > > linux-next. > > > > I just apply the three patches against for-5.11/block, and they can be > done cleanly. Ah, sorry. It was a bit whitespace damages on my end. This did really fix the megasas_raid boot hang here. Since 103fbf8e4020 ("scsi: megaraid_sas: Added support for shared host tagset for cpuhotplug") is now in the mainline, it probably makes sense to merge this patchset for v5.10 as well to avoid breakage. Anyway, Tested-by: Qian Cai _______________________________________________ Linux-nvme mailing list Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme