From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: "Ewan D. Milne" <emilne@redhat.com>, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Cc: tsong@purestorage.com, jmeneghi@redhat.com, mlombard@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] block: introduce blk_queue_nr_active()
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2023 09:36:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c63ee412-3f34-49c7-b873-16b37683dc90@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230925163123.16042-2-emilne@redhat.com>
On 9/25/23 18:31, Ewan D. Milne wrote:
> Returns a count of the total number of active requests
> in a queue. For non-shared tags (the usual case) this is
> the sum of nr_active from all of the hctxs.
>
Bit of an exaggeration here.
Shared tags are in use if the hardware supports only a global tag space
(ie basically all SCSI and FC HBAs).
> Signed-off-by: Ewan D. Milne <emilne@redhat.com>
> ---
> block/blk-mq.h | 5 -----
> include/linux/blk-mq.h | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.h b/block/blk-mq.h
> index 1743857e0b01..fbc65eefa017 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq.h
> +++ b/block/blk-mq.h
> @@ -214,11 +214,6 @@ static inline bool blk_mq_tag_is_reserved(struct blk_mq_tags *tags,
> return tag < tags->nr_reserved_tags;
> }
>
> -static inline bool blk_mq_is_shared_tags(unsigned int flags)
> -{
> - return flags & BLK_MQ_F_TAG_HCTX_SHARED;
> -}
> -
> static inline struct blk_mq_tags *blk_mq_tags_from_data(struct blk_mq_alloc_data *data)
> {
> if (data->rq_flags & RQF_SCHED_TAGS)
> diff --git a/include/linux/blk-mq.h b/include/linux/blk-mq.h
> index 01e8c31db665..c921ae5236ab 100644
> --- a/include/linux/blk-mq.h
> +++ b/include/linux/blk-mq.h
> @@ -716,6 +716,32 @@ int blk_rq_poll(struct request *rq, struct io_comp_batch *iob,
>
> bool blk_mq_queue_inflight(struct request_queue *q);
>
> +#define queue_for_each_hw_ctx(q, hctx, i) \
> + xa_for_each(&(q)->hctx_table, (i), (hctx))
> +
> +#define hctx_for_each_ctx(hctx, ctx, i) \
> + for ((i) = 0; (i) < (hctx)->nr_ctx && \
> + ({ ctx = (hctx)->ctxs[(i)]; 1; }); (i)++)
> +
> +static inline bool blk_mq_is_shared_tags(unsigned int flags)
> +{
> + return flags & BLK_MQ_F_TAG_HCTX_SHARED;
> +}
> +
> +static inline unsigned int blk_mq_queue_nr_active(struct request_queue *q)
> +{
> + unsigned int nr_active = 0;
> + struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx;
> + unsigned long i;
> +
> + queue_for_each_hw_ctx(q, hctx, i) {
> + if (unlikely(blk_mq_is_shared_tags(hctx->flags)))
> + return atomic_read(&q->nr_active_requests_shared_tags);
> + nr_active += atomic_read(&hctx->nr_active);
> + }
> + return nr_active;
> +}
> +
> enum {
> /* return when out of requests */
> BLK_MQ_REQ_NOWAIT = (__force blk_mq_req_flags_t)(1 << 0),
> @@ -941,13 +967,6 @@ static inline void *blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(struct request *rq)
> return rq + 1;
> }
>
> -#define queue_for_each_hw_ctx(q, hctx, i) \
> - xa_for_each(&(q)->hctx_table, (i), (hctx))
> -
> -#define hctx_for_each_ctx(hctx, ctx, i) \
> - for ((i) = 0; (i) < (hctx)->nr_ctx && \
> - ({ ctx = (hctx)->ctxs[(i)]; 1; }); (i)++)
> -
> static inline void blk_mq_cleanup_rq(struct request *rq)
> {
> if (rq->q->mq_ops->cleanup_rq)
Well. As discussed, using xarray on 'small' arrays is horrible for
performance. We really should revert the patch from Ming to
turn it back into a simple array; that'll make traversing much faster.
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke Kernel Storage Architect
hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), Geschäftsführer: Ivo Totev, Andrew
Myers, Andrew McDonald, Martje Boudien Moerman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-27 7:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-25 16:31 [PATCH 0/3] NVMe multipath path selector enhancements Ewan D. Milne
2023-09-25 16:31 ` [PATCH 1/3] block: introduce blk_queue_nr_active() Ewan D. Milne
2023-09-25 20:56 ` Bart Van Assche
2023-09-27 14:49 ` Ewan Milne
2023-09-27 14:58 ` Bart Van Assche
2023-09-27 7:36 ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2023-09-27 11:37 ` Ming Lei
2023-09-27 13:34 ` Ewan Milne
2023-10-03 20:11 ` Uday Shankar
2023-10-04 9:19 ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-09-27 9:49 ` Ming Lei
2023-09-27 13:54 ` Ewan Milne
2023-09-27 10:56 ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-09-27 13:50 ` Ewan Milne
2023-09-28 10:56 ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-09-25 16:31 ` [PATCH 2/3] nvme-multipath: Implement new iopolicy "queue-depth" Ewan D. Milne
2023-09-27 7:38 ` Hannes Reinecke
2023-09-27 11:02 ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-09-27 13:42 ` Ewan Milne
2023-09-25 16:31 ` [PATCH 3/3] nvme-multipath: add "use_nonoptimized" module option Ewan D. Milne
2023-09-27 7:41 ` Hannes Reinecke
2023-09-27 11:31 ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-09-27 13:11 ` John Meneghini
2023-09-27 13:45 ` Ewan Milne
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c63ee412-3f34-49c7-b873-16b37683dc90@suse.de \
--to=hare@suse.de \
--cc=emilne@redhat.com \
--cc=jmeneghi@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mlombard@redhat.com \
--cc=tsong@purestorage.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox