From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com (Bart Van Assche)
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 20:58:48 +0000
Subject: [RFC PATCH 3/3] blk-mq: Remove generation seqeunce
In-Reply-To: <20180718205321.GA32160@localhost.localdomain>
References: <20180521231131.6685-4-keith.busch@intel.com>
 <c42d13289e38df93bb35e9876b803420e40b03d3.camel@wdc.com>
 <20180712192437.GA16839@localhost.localdomain>
 <7cad25b821c3a640e036f28ff1bbe51e7362d25d.camel@wdc.com>
 <20180713154346.GA18955@localhost.localdomain>
 <a32b251bd3c0a186e5c5ba82656a85fbdcc0c5e4.camel@wdc.com>
 <20180713184712.GA19419@localhost.localdomain>
 <291a13b35af1b65fbbe99a3a9cfc7d570a620cd9.camel@wdc.com>
 <20180713235807.GA19967@localhost.localdomain>
 <20180718195650.GA20336@lst.de>
 <20180718205321.GA32160@localhost.localdomain>
Message-ID: <c67f3da64914a436bc76f3ec0bc261ee6178cd14.camel@wdc.com>

On Wed, 2018-07-18@14:53 -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> If scsi needs this behavior, why not just put that behavior in scsi? It
> can set the state to complete and then everything can play out as
> before.
> [ ... ]

There may be other drivers that need the same protection the SCSI core needs
so I think the patch at the end of your previous e-mail is a step in the wrong
direction.

Bart.