From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: sagi@grimberg.me (Sagi Grimberg)
Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2017 15:31:29 +0300
Subject: [PATCH RFC] nvme-rdma: support devices with queue size < 32
In-Reply-To: <1917497781.360337179.1491571916242.JavaMail.zimbra@kalray.eu>
References: <1315914765.312051621.1490259849534.JavaMail.zimbra@kalray.eu>
 <80770042-743e-a271-c636-f72099f9ac56@grimberg.me>
 <9eb08168-18a6-a176-01df-b68b6a225963@redhat.com>
 <3505b835-d0ba-70cb-dfe8-1265fc2bbb83@redhat.com>
 <2ba93b5b-ad36-5533-36e2-9db2e3198c19@grimberg.me>
 <1121115847.336382032.1490883808617.JavaMail.zimbra@kalray.eu>
 <1224897571.353404199.1491481743295.JavaMail.zimbra@kalray.eu>
 <20170406130207.GI2269@mtr-leonro.local>
 <1917497781.360337179.1491571916242.JavaMail.zimbra@kalray.eu>
Message-ID: <c7e56394-feb3-282b-0eec-166ef0d8b13c@grimberg.me>


>>> Mellanox guys, do you have an idea what it might do?
>>
>> It will continue to work as expected with long depths too.
>> All that you need is do not to forget to issue signal if queue is terminated.
>>
>
> Thanks Leon. I will then submit the v2.

Marta, can you please test with higher queue-depth? Say 512 and/or 1024?

Thanks,
Sagi.