From: sagi@grimberg.me (Sagi Grimberg)
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] nvme-rdma: Make sure to shutdown the controller if we can
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 09:19:56 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cf6b0293-aba9-1a6f-28f2-3754b2eec4af@grimberg.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160801154840.GB22771@lst.de>
>>>> - if (ctrl->ctrl.state == NVME_CTRL_LIVE)
>>>> + if (test_bit(NVME_RDMA_Q_CONNECTED, &ctrl->queues[0].flags))
>>>> nvme_shutdown_ctrl(&ctrl->ctrl);
>>>>
>>>> blk_mq_stop_hw_queues(ctrl->ctrl.admin_q);
>>>
>>> Maybe the right way to handle this is to unconditionally call
>>> nvme_shutdown_ctrl and make sure we return an early error
>>> on the register write?
>>
>> As I wrote on patch 2/5 reply, I'd like to avoid depending on
>> queue_rq to fail early peeking at the ctrl state. This dependency
>> can grow in the future and I think we should at least try not to
>> go there...
>
> I don't want ->queue_rq to peek at controller state. What I had
> in mind was copying the PCIe behavior of failing early in the
> timeout handler if we are in the reset handler, which will
> mean blk_execute_rq will return ASAP with an error.
Do we want the unnecessary ADMIN_TIMEOUT for sending a shutdown
on a queue we know is not connected? I'm worried it will have scale
issues...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-02 6:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-29 19:57 [PATCH 0/5] Some fabrics fixes Sagi Grimberg
2016-07-29 19:57 ` [PATCH 1/5] nvme-rdma: Fix device removal handling Sagi Grimberg
2016-08-01 11:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-07-29 19:57 ` [PATCH 2/5] nvme-rdma: Free the I/O tags when we delete the controller Sagi Grimberg
2016-08-01 11:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-01 11:15 ` Sagi Grimberg
2016-08-01 15:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-02 6:14 ` Sagi Grimberg
2016-07-29 19:57 ` [PATCH 3/5] nvme-rdma: Make sure to shutdown the controller if we can Sagi Grimberg
2016-08-01 11:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-01 11:17 ` Sagi Grimberg
2016-08-01 15:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-02 6:19 ` Sagi Grimberg [this message]
2016-08-02 12:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-02 13:26 ` Sagi Grimberg
2016-07-29 19:57 ` [PATCH 4/5] nvme-rdma: Remove duplicate call to nvme_remove_namespaces Sagi Grimberg
2016-08-01 11:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-01 11:21 ` Sagi Grimberg
2016-07-29 19:57 ` [PATCH 5/5] nvme-loop: " Sagi Grimberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cf6b0293-aba9-1a6f-28f2-3754b2eec4af@grimberg.me \
--to=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).