Linux-NVME Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: Michael Bommarito <michael.bommarito@gmail.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
	Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] nvmet-auth: reject short AUTH_RECEIVE buffers
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2026 09:09:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <eeef8a54-ca94-46f5-aae5-2d9933dbf922@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260609182431.2437882-1-michael.bommarito@gmail.com>

On 6/9/26 20:24, Michael Bommarito wrote:
> nvmet_execute_auth_receive() trusts the AUTH_RECEIVE allocation length
> after checking only that it is nonzero and matches the transfer length.
> In the SUCCESS1 and FAILURE1/default states, that lets a remote NVMe-oF
> initiator reach the fixed-size DH-HMAC-CHAP response builders with a
> kmalloc() buffer shorter than the response, so nvmet_auth_success1() and
> nvmet_auth_failure1() write past the allocation; both only WARN_ON the
> short length and then format the message anyway.
> 
> Impact: A remote NVMe-oF initiator with access to an auth-enabled target
> can trigger a 16-byte heap out-of-bounds write via a one-byte
> AUTH_RECEIVE allocation length.
> 
> Compute the minimum response length for the current DH-HMAC-CHAP step in
> nvmet_auth_receive_data_len() and report a zero data length when the
> host-supplied allocation length is shorter, so the existing zero-length
> check in nvmet_execute_auth_receive() rejects the command before any
> builder runs. The SUCCESS1 minimum is sizeof(struct
> nvmf_auth_dhchap_success1_data) plus the HMAC hash length, because the
> response hash is written into the rval[] flexible-array tail, so the
> minimum is state dependent rather than a flat sizeof. CHALLENGE keeps its
> existing variable-length guard in nvmet_auth_challenge().
> 
> This is reachable only when in-band DH-HMAC-CHAP authentication is
> configured on the target.
> 
> Fixes: db1312dd9548 ("nvmet: implement basic In-Band Authentication")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Assisted-by: Codex:gpt-5-5-xhigh
> Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4-8
> Signed-off-by: Michael Bommarito <michael.bommarito@gmail.com>
> ---
> v2:
>    - Move the length check into nvmet_auth_receive_data_len() and reject
>      via the existing zero-length guard in nvmet_execute_auth_receive(),
>      per Hannes Reinecke's review. No separate helper, and
>      nvmet_execute_auth_receive() itself is unchanged.
> 
> With CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE and KASAN enabled, a short al (for example
> al=1) on the SUCCESS1 path aborts in the sizeof(*data)=16 header memset
> in nvmet_auth_success1() with "memset: detected buffer overflow: 16 byte
> write of buffer size 1". After this change the same input is rejected
> before allocation and the abort no longer occurs. Validated with a
> KUnit/KASAN harness under UML: the stock kernel crashed and the patched
> kernel passed; the in-tree nvme-auth KUnit suite still passes.
> ---
>   drivers/nvme/target/fabrics-cmd-auth.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>   1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@kernel.org>

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke                  Kernel Storage Architect
hare@suse.de                                +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Frankenstr. 146, 90461 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), GF: I. Totev, A. McDonald, W. Knoblich


  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-10  7:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-09 18:24 [PATCH v2] nvmet-auth: reject short AUTH_RECEIVE buffers Michael Bommarito
2026-06-10  7:09 ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2026-06-10 14:44 ` Keith Busch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=eeef8a54-ca94-46f5-aae5-2d9933dbf922@suse.de \
    --to=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=kch@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=michael.bommarito@gmail.com \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox