From: Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanyak@nvidia.com>
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
"linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: block dangerous passthrough operation
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2022 06:48:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f22696cb-eefb-66fd-9062-c91fd2800669@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y3UL2LER7I9KUxGW@kbusch-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
> There's nothing preventing a vendor specific command from being just as
> destructive either, but you can't realistically fence those off either.
> I've always said the driver should not police this user interface as
> that inevitably gets in the way of its flexibility.
>
The list will grow over time and we'll have to deal with all sorts of
patches/spec modifications and even if we all do that as mentioned
earlier I don't see any way to block Vendor specific commands ...
-ck
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-17 6:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20221116130636epcas5p39a586e15d27045752f18d022f4efd74a@epcas5p3.samsung.com>
2022-11-16 13:01 ` block dangerous passthrough operation Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-16 13:01 ` [PATCH 1/4] nvme: return an errno from nvme_cmd_allowed Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-16 13:01 ` [PATCH 2/4] nvme: don't allow user space to send fabrics commands Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-16 13:01 ` [PATCH 3/4] nvme: don't allow userspace to set the Host Behavior Support feature Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-16 13:01 ` [PATCH 4/4] nvme: reject passthrough of queue creation / deletion commands Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-16 13:25 ` block dangerous passthrough operation Kanchan Joshi
2022-11-16 13:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-16 13:43 ` Kanchan Joshi
2022-11-16 15:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-17 3:13 ` Kanchan Joshi
2022-11-21 7:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-16 16:12 ` Keith Busch
2022-11-17 3:51 ` Kanchan Joshi
2022-11-17 16:03 ` Keith Busch
2022-11-17 6:48 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni [this message]
2022-11-21 7:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-17 3:49 ` Jens Axboe
2022-11-21 7:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-21 15:35 ` Keith Busch
2022-11-22 6:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-22 10:38 ` Sagi Grimberg
2022-11-22 12:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-22 15:11 ` Keith Busch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f22696cb-eefb-66fd-9062-c91fd2800669@nvidia.com \
--to=chaitanyak@nvidia.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox